为研究共享汽车作为高铁站接驳交通出行方式的可行性，在大连北站、长春西站和哈尔滨西站3个高铁站的候车厅内对出行者随机抽样，进行行为调查（Stated Preference, SP）与意向调查（Revealed Preference, RP）的组合问卷调查，并建立多项离散选择模型（Multinomial Logit Model）对影响高铁站接驳交通出行的因素进行分析。结果显示，等待时间、出行时间、费用和押金均对出行者接驳交通出行方式的选择具有显著影响，且均对共享汽车产生负效用；选择共享汽车进行高铁站接驳出行的出行者主要特征有年龄为18~30岁、与他人结伴出行、日常出行方式为私家车、高铁出行目的为旅游、月收入较高、喜欢开车、接驳出行距离较远等。“高铁+共享汽车”服务模式具有可行性，但是目前受访者对共享汽车的使用率和了解程度均较低，需要加大共享汽车的宣传力度并提高其服务质量。
In order to study the feasibility of car-sharing as a high-speed railway station feeder transportation mode, a SP(Stated Preference) and RP(Revealed Preference) combined survey was conducted to randomly sampled travelers at the waiting hall of Dalianbei Railway Station, Changchunxi Railway Station and Harbinxi Railway Station, then a MNL(Multinomial Logit) model was established to analyze the influencing factors of feeder transportation mode choice behavior. The results show that waiting time, travel time, cost and deposit have significant impacts on travelers′ feeder transportation mode choice behavior, and have negative effects on car-sharing; the main characteristics of travelers who choose to travel by car-sharing as high-speed railway station feeder transportation are as follows: 18~30 years old, travelling with others, daily travel by private car, travelling by high-speed railway for tourism, high monthly income, preferring to drive, and long feeder transportation distance. It is concluded that the service pattern of "high-speed rail" plus "car-sharing" is feasible. However, the usage rate and familiarity degree of car-sharing are low currently. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the publicity of car-sharing and improve the quality of its service.
[1] HABID K M N, MORENCY C, ISLAM M T, et al. Modelling users′ behaviour of a carsharing program: Application of a joint hazard and zero inflated dynamic ordered probability model[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2012, 46(2): 241-254.
[2] JOCHEM P, FRANKENHAUSER D, EWALD L, et al. Does free-floating carsharing reduce private vehicle ownership? The case of SHARE NOW in European cities[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2020, 141: 373-395.
[3] MARTIN E, SHAHEEN S A, LIDICKER J R. Impact of carsharing on household vehicle holdings: Results from North American shared-use vehicle survey[J]. Institute of Transportation Studies Working Paper, 2010, 46(2143):150-158.
[4] TRAN V, ZHAO S C, DIOP EL B, et al. Travelers′ acceptance of electric carsharing systems in developing countries: The case of China[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(19): 1-22.
[5] BALAC M, CIARI F, AXHAUSEN K W. Modeling the impact of parking price policy on free-floating carsharing: Case study for Zurich, Switzerland[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2017, 77: 207-225.
[6] RABBITT N, GHOSH B. A study of feasibility and potential benefits of organised car sharing in Ireland[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2013, 25: 49-58.
[7] COLL M H, VANDERSMISSEN M H, THéRIAULT M. Modeling spatio-temporal diffusion of carsharing membership in Québec City[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2014, 38: 22-37.
[8] WAPPELHORST S, SAUER M, HINKELDEIN D, et al. Potential of electric carsharing in urban and rural areas[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2014, 4: 374-386.
[9] LUCA S, PACE R. Modelling users′ behaviour in inter-urban carsharing program: A stated preference approach[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015, 71: 59-76.
[10] 刘向，董德存，王宁，等. 基于Nested Logit的电动汽车分时租赁选择行为分析[J]. 同济大学学报（自然科学版），2019，47（1）：47-55.
[11] 张荣花，关宏志，赵磊，等. 考虑汽车共享服务的出行方式选择影响因素研究[J]. 交通运输研究，2020，6（3）：48-54.
[12] 史乐峰，吕通，陈真. 共享汽车租赁定价策略研究——基于租还车便捷度和单车驾乘体验度的分析[J]. 价格理论与实践，2018（4）：155-158.
[13] 孙立山，王顺超，罗薇，等. 基于用地分布特征的共享汽车需求估计模型[J]. 重庆交通大学学报（自然科学版），2020，39（5）：1-6.
[14] 王宁，郑文晖，刘向，等. 基于用户激励的共享电动汽车调度成本优化[J]. 同济大学学报（自然科学版），2018，46（12）：1668-1675，1721.
[15] 戴学臻，吴智伟，王小双. 高铁车站接驳方式的换乘效率评价方法[J]. 城市轨道交通研究，2016，19（8）：55-57，73.
[16] 王婧. 全球共享汽车行业仍然面临多重阻力[N]. 经济参考报，2021-3-26（6）.
京公网安备 11010102003417号
京ICP备17006742号-3