封闭道路条件下基于广播式Wi-Fi的车路协同系统信息交互性能测试及评价

doi:10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2021.02.005

交通运输研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2) : 38-46. DOI: 10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2021.02.005

高茁苗，杨　琪，高　剑，邓蓉蓉

作者信息 +

Performance Test and Evaluation of Cooperative Vehicle Infrastructure System Information Interaction Based on Broadcast Wi-Fi in Closed Test Field

GAO Zhuo-miao, YANG Qi, GAO Jian, DENG Rong-rong

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

为评估车路协同系统的信息交互实际应用效果，以适应车路协同系统安全可靠的发展要求，测试基于广播式Wi-Fi的车路协同系统信息交互性能。选取丢包率和通信时延作为评价通信性能的代表性指标，构建实际道路交通场景并根据车速将其分为动态和静态两种类型。在不同通信距离和视距条件下设计4种详细的测试方案，在试验场的封闭道路上布设车载和路侧设备进行互相通信，通过采集和处理测试数据，分析通信距离、车速和视距对车路协同系统通信性能的影响。结果表明：通信距离和视距是丢包率最为明显的影响因素，通信距离越长，车路协同信息交互性能越差，丢包率越高，并且视距条件下的丢包率比非视距条件下低，而车速对丢包率无较大影响；车速、通信距离和视距均对通信时延影响不大。由此可知，通信距离和视距是导致基于广播式Wi-Fi的车路协同系统信息交互设备通信性能下降的重要因素，因此车路协同系统应保持在一定的通信距离范围和视距条件下进行信息交互，以确保不同种类消息传输的丢包率和通信时延达到要求值，满足实际道路上的应用要求。

Abstract

In order to evaluate the practical application effect of CVIS (Cooperative Vehicle Infrastructure System) information interaction and adapt to the development requirements of system security and reliability, the performance of CVIS information interaction based on broadcast Wi-Fi was tested. The packet loss rate and communication delay were selected as the test indicators of communication performance. Via constructing actual road traffic scenes divided into dynamic and static ones according to vehicle speed, and designing 4 detailed test schemes under different communication distance and line-of-sight conditions, the OBU (On-Board Unit) and RSU (Roadside Unit) were deployed in the closed test field to communicate with each other and the data was collected and processed to analyze the influence of distance, vehicle speed and line-of-sight on the communication performance of CVIS. The results showed that communication distance and line-of-sight were the most obvious influencing factors of packet loss rate, the farther the communication distance was, the worse the performance of CVIS information interaction was, and the higher the packet loss rate was; the packet loss rate under line-of-sight condition was lower than that under non line-of-sight condition, but the speed had no great influence on the packet loss rate; the speed, communication distance and line-of-sight had little influence on the communication delay. It can be seen that communication distance and line-of-sight are the important factors that lead to the degradation of communication performance of CVIS information interaction based on broadcast Wi-Fi. Therefore, CVIS should maintain information interaction within a certain communication range and line-of-sight conditions to ensure that the packet loss rate and communication delay of different kinds of message transmission reach the required value, so as to meet the application requirements on the actual road.

导出引用

高茁苗，杨　琪，高　剑，邓蓉蓉. 封闭道路条件下基于广播式Wi-Fi的车路协同系统信息交互性能测试及评价[J]. 交通运输研究. 2021, 7(2): 38-46 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2021.02.005

GAO Zhuo-miao, YANG Qi, GAO Jian, DENG Rong-rong. Performance Test and Evaluation of Cooperative Vehicle Infrastructure System Information Interaction Based on Broadcast Wi-Fi in Closed Test Field[J]. Transport Research. 2021, 7(2): 38-46 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2021.02.005

参考文献

[1] 　SUN R, HU J M, XIE X D, et al. Variable speed limit design to relieve traffic congestion based on cooperative vehicle infrastructure system[J]. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 138: 427-438.
[2] 　李晓阳. WiFi技术及其应用与发展[J]. 信息技术，2012（2）：196-198.
[3] 　张令文，刘留，何雨佳，等. 全球车载通信DSRC标准发展及应用[J]. 公路交通科技，2011，28（S1）：71-76.
[4] 　AHMAD S, MUSLEH S, NORDIN R. The gap between expectation & reality: long term evolution (LTE) & third generation (3G) network performance in campus with test mobile system (TEMS)[C]// 2015 9th Asia Modelling Symposium (AMS). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: IEEE, 2016: 164-168.
[5] 　HUANG X N, ZHAO D, PENG H. Empirical study of DSRC performance based on safety pilot model deployment data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2017, 18(10): 2619-2628.
[6] 　CARPENTER S E, SICHITIU M L. Analysis of packet loss in a large-scale DSRC field operational test[C]// 2016 International Conference on Performance Evaluation and Modeling in Wired and Wireless Networks (PEMWN). Paris: IEEE Press, 2016: 1-6.
[7] 　WANG Y Z, HU J M, ZHANG Y, et al. Reliability evaluation of IEEE 802.11p-based vehicle-to-vehicle communication in an urban expressway[J]. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2015, 20(4): 417-428.
[8] 　杨良义，陈涛，谢飞. 车路协同系统功能实现的场景测试技术研究[J]. 重庆理工大学学报（自然科学版），2018，32（5）：43-47.
[9] 　王润民，邓晓峰，徐志刚，等. 车联网仿真测试评价技术研究综述[J]. 计算机应用研究，2019，36（7）：1921-1926，1939.
[10]　杜晓琳. 车路协同系统中通信管理系统设计及其功能仿真[D]. 北京：北京交通大学，2013.
[11]　段宗涛，郑西彬，李莹，等. 车联网环境下的WiFi网络实验床[J]. 微电子学与计算机，2015，32（7）：90-94.
[12]　张东亮，李晓欢，叶进，等. 基于DSRC的车载自组网终端设计及性能测试[J]. 移动通信，2015，39（Z1）：117-121.
[13]　舒红，袁康，修海林，等. 自动驾驶汽车基础测试场景构建研究[J]. 中国公路学报，2019，32（11）：245-254.
[14]　张凯帆. 基于封闭场地实验的自动驾驶汽车智能度和接受度测评研究[D]. 西安：长安大学，2019.
[15]　刘丁贝，张心睿，王润民，等. 封闭测试场条件下基于DSRC的车联网通信性能测试[J]. 汽车工程学报，2020，10（3）：180-187.
[16]　ABBOUD K, OMAR H A, ZHUANG W H. Interworking of DSRC and cellular network technologies for V2X communications: a survey[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2016, 65(12): 9457-9470.
[17]　陆忠梅，陈巍，魏杰，等. 车联网极低时延与高可靠通信：现状与展望[J]. 信号处理，2019，35（11）：1773-1783.
[18]　常雪阳，许庆，李克强，等. 通信时延与丢包下智能网联汽车控制性能分析[J]. 中国公路学报，2019，32（6）：216-225.
[19]　陈柠. 车联网安全消息传输可靠性及实时性的研究[D]. 成都：电子科技大学，2018.
[20]　朱冰，张培兴，赵健，等. 基于场景的自动驾驶汽车虚拟测试研究进展[J]. 中国公路学报，2019，32（6）：1-19.