面向复杂交叉口的能量势场自适应避撞

王秀杰, 韦鸿展

交通运输研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (4) : 69-84.

PDF(4337 KB)
PDF(4337 KB)
交通运输研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (4) : 69-84. DOI: 10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2026.04.007
理论与方法

面向复杂交叉口的能量势场自适应避撞

作者信息 +

Adaptive Collision Avoidance Based on Energy Potential Field for Complex Intersections

  • Wang Xiujie 1, 2 ,  
  • Wei Hongzhan 1, *
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为降低复杂交叉口场景下自动紧急制动(Autonomous Emergency Braking, AEB)系统的碰撞风险并兼顾乘坐舒适性,提出了一种基于运动学能量等效人工势场与模型预测控制(Kinematic Energy Equivalent Artificial Potential Field and Model Predictive Control, KEE-MPC)的分层避撞策略。首先,在上层决策模块引入运动学能量等效人工势场(Kinematic Energy Equivalent Artificial Potential Field, KEE-APF)模型,将路口物理冲突转化为动态碰撞动能评估,并设定双重动态跃度边界机制以实现刚柔控制。其次,设计二维模糊逻辑控制器,以碰撞时间和等效排斥减速度为输入,实时动态调节模型预测控制(Model Predictive Control, MPC)优化框架中状态跟踪与控制增量的权重配比。然后,在底层执行模块构建逆纵向动力学与连续时间比例-积分-微分(Proportional-Integral-Derivative, PID)反馈补偿相融合的双轨结构,精准跟踪期望减速度。最后,依托联合仿真平台开展突发横穿等极限工况测试。结果表明,所提控制策略在全部测试工况中均实现了100%的有效避撞,而传统碰撞时间(Time-to-Collision, TTC)策略避撞率仅为55%;相较于传统控制策略,该策略将最大制动加速度变化率有效约束在6.0~9.1 m/s3,远低于传统策略的30 m/s3;所提策略在满足极限工况避撞安全要求的前提下,改善了车辆的乘坐舒适性,可为复杂交互场景下的自动紧急制动系统多目标优化提供参考依据。

Abstract

To reduce the collision risk of the Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) system in complex intersection scenarios and take into account passenger comfort, a hierarchical collision avoidance strategy based on Kinematic Energy Equivalent Artificial Potential Field and Model Predictive Control (KEE-MPC) is proposed. Firstly, the Kinematic Energy Equivalent Artificial Potential Field (KEE-APF) model is introduced in the upper-level decision-making module to transform the physical conflicts at intersections into dynamic collision kinetic energy assessment, and a dual dynamic jump boundary mechanism is set up to achieve rigid and flexible control. Secondly, a two-dimensional fuzzy logic controller is designed, taking collision time and equivalent repulsive deceleration as inputs, to dynamically adjust the weight ratio of state tracking and control increment in the Model Predictive Control (MPC) optimization framework in real time. Then, a dual-track structure integrating inverse longitudinal dynamics and continuous-time Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) feedback compensation is constructed in the lower-level execution module to precisely track the expected deceleration. Finally, tests under extreme conditions such as sudden crossing are conducted on a joint simulation platform. The results show that the proposed control strategy achieves 100% effective collision avoidance in all test conditions, while the traditional Time-to-Collision (TTC) strategy only has a 55% collision avoidance rate. Compared with the traditional control strategy, the proposed strategy effectively constrains the maximum acceleration rate of change within 6.0 to 9.1 m/s3, which is much lower than the 30 m/s3 of the traditional strategy. The proposed strategy improves the vehicle's ride comfort under the premise of meeting the safety requirements of collision avoidance in extreme conditions, and can provide a reference basis for the multi-objective optimization of the AEB system in complex interaction scenarios.

关键词

自动紧急制动 / 模型预测控制 / 人工势场法 / 模糊控制 / 乘坐舒适性

Key words

automatic emergency braking / model predictive control / artificial potential field method / fuzzy control / ride comfort

引用本文

导出引用
王秀杰, 韦鸿展. 面向复杂交叉口的能量势场自适应避撞[J]. 交通运输研究. 2026, 12(4): 69-84 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2026.04.007
Wang Xiujie, Wei Hongzhan. Adaptive Collision Avoidance Based on Energy Potential Field for Complex Intersections[J]. Transport Research. 2026, 12(4): 69-84 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2026.04.007
中图分类号: U467.5   

参考文献

[1]
潜磊, 罗经纬, 彭君, 等. WorldSim和LogSim在自动紧急制动系统决策控制软件开发中的应用研究[J]. 汽车技术, 2025(12):56-62.
[2]
Zhao Shishu, Liu Yang, Zhang Shuai, et al. Research on AEB car-to-car test scenario in intersection environment[C]// International Conference on Smart Transportation and City Engineering(STCE 2023). Bellingham,USA: SPIE, 2024:130185P.
[3]
Lai Fei, Yang Hui, Huang Chaoqun. Automatic emergency collision avoidance of straight-crossing intelligent vehicle at a 90-degree intersection based on vehicle-to-everything technology[J]. SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety, 2023, 11(3):331-344.
[4]
Mu Rui, Yu Wenhao, Li Zhongxing, et al. Motion planning for autonomous vehicles in unanticipated obstacle scenarios at intersections based on artificial potential field[J]. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(4):1626.
[5]
Wang Qingfan, Zhou Qing, Lin Miao, et al. Human injury-based safety decision of automated vehicles[J]. iScience, 2022, 25(8):104703.
[6]
Nilsson J, Silvlin J, Brannstrom M, et al. If,when,and how to perform lane change maneuvers on highways[J]. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 2016, 8(4):68-78.
[7]
Fu Xiang, Wan Jiaqi, Wu Daibing, et al. Research on vehicle AEB control strategy based on safety time-safety distance fusion algorithm[J]. Mathematics, 2024, 12(12):1905.
[8]
Khatib O. Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots[J]. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 1986, 5(1): 90-98.
[9]
Huang Yanjun, Ding Haitao, Zhang Yubiao, et al. A motion planning and tracking framework for autonomous vehicles based on artificial potential field elaborated resistance network approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2019, 67(2):1376-1386.
[10]
Ahn S, Oh T, Yoo J. Collision avoidance path planning for automated vehicles using prediction information and artificial potential field[J]. Sensors, 2024, 24(22):7292.
[11]
Lin Pengfei, Javanmardi E, Tao Y, et al. Time-to-collision-aware lane-change strategy based on potential field and cubic polynomial for autonomous vehicles[C]// 2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium(Ⅳ). Anchorage,USA: IEEE, 2023:1-6.
[12]
舒红, 张光琛, 何杉, 等. 汽车自动紧急制动系统控制研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2023, 40(7):216-223,230.
[13]
刘永涛, 刘传攀, 刘湘安, 等. 基于自适应采样时间MPC的自动紧急制动系统[J]. 汽车工程, 2023, 45(1):32-41.
[14]
陆颖, 陈烨, 杨鹏, 等. 基于自适应权重MPC的AEB-P控制策略研究[J]. 河北科技大学学报, 2024, 45(4):341-350.
[15]
Singh A S P, Nishihara O. Modeling of autonomous emergency braking system with minimum jerk[C]// 2022 22nd international conference on control,automation and systems (ICCAS). Jeju,Republic of Korea: IEEE, 2022:40-44.
[16]
Zhao Lei, Liu Hongda, Niu Wentie. Collision avoidance of driving robotic vehicles based on model predictive control with improved APF[J]. Machines, 2025, 13(8):696.
[17]
Xu Mingyang, Xu Chen, Qi Gengxin, et al. Dynamic obstacle avoidance method for road vehicles via improved artificial potential field[C]// 2023 7th CAA international conference on vehicular control and intelligence(CVCI). Changsha,China: IEEE, 2023:1-6.
[18]
Hamid U Z A, Zamzuri H, Rahman M A A, et al. Collision avoidance system using artificial potential field and nonlinear model predictive control: a case study of intersection collisions with sudden appearing moving vehicles[M]// Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks Vol 1. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press, 2017:367-372.
[19]
Zhang Lin, Yu Zhidong, Xu Xiaowei, et al. Research on automatic emergency braking system based on target recognition and fusion control strategy in curved road[J]. Electronics, 2023, 12(16):3490.
[20]
Yan Jing, Gao Jin, Yang Xian, et al. Position tracking control of remotely operated underwater vehicles with communication delay[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2019, 28(6): 2506-2514.
[21]
刘西, 明朗, 胡远志. 基于MPC算法的车辆自适应巡航系统分层控制研究[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 35(3):53-60.
[22]
王艺, 蔡英凤, 陈龙, 等. 基于模型预测控制的智能网联汽车路径跟踪控制器设计[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(8):136-144,153.
[23]
杜荣华, 胡鸿飞, 高凯, 等. 基于变预测时域MPC的自动驾驶汽车轨迹跟踪控制研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(24):275-288.
[24]
庞辉, 刘楠, 刘敏豪, 等. 基于线性时变模型预测控制的自主车辆轨迹跟踪控制器设计与验证[J]. 机械工程学报, 2022, 58(24):264-274.

基金

广西科技重大专项子课题(桂科AA19182006-2)
广西科技大学博士基金项目(校科博24Z03)

PDF(4337 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉