城市电动汽车充电站利用效率与时空分异特征

王玉婷, 庄立坚, 何兆成

交通运输研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3) : 85-96.

交通运输研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3) : 85-96. DOI: 10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2026.03.007
设施布局与网络规划

城市电动汽车充电站利用效率与时空分异特征

作者信息 +

Utilization Efficiency and Spatiotemporal Differentiation Characteristics of Urban EV Charging Stations

  • WANG Yuting 1 ,  
  • ZHUANG Lijian 2 ,  
  • HE Zhaocheng 1, 3, 4, *
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为识别城市公共充电网络的利用效率差异及时空异质性特征,支撑充电基础设施的存量优化与精细化配置,本文提出一种基于多源运营数据的充电站功能分型方法。基于7 572个公共充电站的建设、运营与订单数据,构建涵盖单枪使用频次、充电时长、能量输出及收益水平的多维评价指标体系,并结合主成分分析与无监督聚类实现充电站功能识别。进一步,结合核密度估计与城市用地分类,揭示功能类型、土地属性、时间节律之间的耦合关系。结果显示:高效型站点仅占17.52%,却承载83.74%的充电需求,而71.49%的站点长期处于低利用状态,反映出现有充电网络存在显著的结构性供需错配。不同用地类型对充电行为具有明显塑形作用:高效型站点在交通场站、加油/加气站及住宅区呈现差异化的时间节律与能量输出特征;常规型站点构成稳定的日常补能网络;低效型与闲置型站点则表现出“高容量-低需求”的空间失衡现象。研究表明,城市充电网络优化应由规模扩张转向存量重构与差异化配置。据此,从强化需求约束审批、低效站点动态腾退以及推进跨主体协同监管等方面提出了精细化的治理政策建议。本文提出的功能分型方法可为高效节点识别、低效资源治理及新增设施规划提供数据支撑与决策依据。

Abstract

To identify the utilization efficiency differences and spatiotemporal heterogeneity characteristics in urban public EV(Electric Vehicle) charging networks and to support the optimization of stock and refined configuration of charging infrastructure, this study proposes a data-driven functional classification approach for charging stations using multi-source operational data. Based on the construction, operation, and order data of 7 572 public charging stations, a multidimensional evaluation index system is developed, including single-gun charging frequency, charging duration, energy output, and revenue performance. Principal component analysis and unsupervised clustering are further combined to identify functional station types. Kernel density estimation and urban land-use classification are then integrated to reveal the coupling relationships among functional types, land-use attributes, and temporal charging patterns. The results show that high-efficiency stations account for only 17.52% of all stations but serve 83.74% of the total charging demand, whereas 71.49% of stations remain underutilized for long periods, indicating a significant structural mismatch between infrastructure supply and charging demand. Land-use characteristics significantly shape charging behaviors. High-efficiency stations exhibit differentiated temporal rhythms and energy-output patterns across transport hubs, fuel stations, and residential areas. Regular stations constitute the stable daily charging network, while low-efficiency and idle stations exhibit pronounced "high capacity-low demand" spatial imbalance. The findings suggest that urban charging network optimization should shift from extensive expansion toward stock reconfiguration and differentiated allocation. Consequently, this paper proposes refined governance policy suggestions in terms of reinforcing demand-constrained approvals, implementing dynamic retirement for underutilized stations and promoting cross-sector collaborative supervision. The proposed functional classification framework provides data support and decision-making references for efficient node identification, underutilized resource management, and future charging infrastructure planning.

关键词

城市交通 / 电动汽车 / 电动汽车充电站 / 利用效率 / 聚类分析 / 时空特征

Key words

urban transportation / EV(Electric Vehicle) / EV charging station / utilization efficiency / cluster analysis / spatiotemporal characteristics

引用本文

导出引用
王玉婷, 庄立坚, 何兆成. 城市电动汽车充电站利用效率与时空分异特征[J]. 交通运输研究. 2026, 12(3): 85-96 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2026.03.007
WANG Yuting, ZHUANG Lijian, HE Zhaocheng. Utilization Efficiency and Spatiotemporal Differentiation Characteristics of Urban EV Charging Stations[J]. Transport Research. 2026, 12(3): 85-96 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2026.03.007
中图分类号: U491.1   

参考文献

[1]
IEA. Energy System[EB/OL]. (2023-10-30)[2026-04-30]. https://www.iea.org/energy-system.
[2]
SINGH V, SINGH V, VAIBHAV S. A review and simple meta-analysis of factors influencing adoption of electric vehicles[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2020, 86: 102436. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102436.
[3]
KESTER J, NOEL L, ZARAZUA DE RUBENS G, et al. Policy mechanisms to accelerate electric vehicle adoption: a qualitative review from the Nordic region[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 94: 719-731.
[4]
ZHANG L, ZHAO Z, YANG M, et al. A multi-criteria decision method for performance evaluation of public charging service quality[J]. Energy, 2020, 195: 116958. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.116958.
[5]
RUOSO A, RIBEIRO J. An assessment of barriers and solutions for the deployment of electric vehicles in the Brazilian market[J]. Transport Policy, 2022, 127: 218-229.
[6]
CRUZ-JESUS F, FIGUEIRA-ALVES H, TAM C, et al. Pragmatic and idealistic reasons: what drives electric vehicle drivers′ satisfaction and continuance intention?[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2023, 170: 103626. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103626.
[7]
GLOBISCH J, PLÖTZ P, DÜTSCHKE E, et al. Consumer preferences for public charging infrastructure for electric vehicles[J]. Transport Policy, 2019, 81: 54-63.
[8]
NOEL L, ZARAZUA DE RUBENS G, KESTER J, et al. Understanding the socio-technical nexus of Nordic electric vehicle (EV) barriers: a qualitative discussion of range, price, charging and knowledge[J]. Energy Policy, 2020, 138: 111292. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111292.
[9]
ZHAO Z, LEE C, YAN X. A multi-state model for the service quality evaluation of an electric vehicle charging network via universal generating function[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2025, 200: 110839. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2024.110839.
[10]
PRAKASH K, ALI M, NAEEM M, et al. Bi-level planning and scheduling of electric vehicle charging stations for peak shaving and congestion management in low voltage distribution networks[J]. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 2022, 102: 108235. DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108235.
[11]
ZHAO Z, LEE C, REN J, et al. Optimal EV fast charging station deployment based on a reinforcement learning framework[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2023, 24(8): 8053-8065.
[12]
KANDPAL B, PAREEK P, VERMA A. A robust day-ahead scheduling strategy for EV charging stations in unbalanced distribution grid[J]. Energy, 2022, 249: 123737. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123737.
[13]
LAMONACA S, RYAN L. The state of play in electric vehicle charging services—a review of infrastructure provision, players, and policies[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 154: 111733. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111733.
[14]
KHAKSARI A, TSAOUSOGLOU G, MAKRIS P, et al. Sizing of electric vehicle charging stations with smart charging capabilities and quality of service requirements[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021, 70: 102872. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102872.
[15]
ZHAO Z, XU M, LEE C. Capacity planning for an electric vehicle charging station considering fuzzy quality of service and multiple charging options[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2021, 70(12): 12529-12541.
[16]
FANG Y, WEI W, MEI S, et al. Promoting electric vehicle charging infrastructure considering policy incentives and user preferences: an evolutionary game model in a small-world network[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 258: 120753. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120753.
[17]
MÜLLER W, LEYER M, DEGIRMENCI K, et al. Designing EV charging networks from a city perspective: a conceptual analysis[J]. Energy Policy, 2025, 198: 114516. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114516.
[18]
梁仁鸿, 孙杨, 王嫱, 等. 基于Critic赋权法的我国“四好农村路”发展水平评价[J]. 交通运输研究, 2025, 11(1):30-38.
[19]
YI Z, LIU X, WEI R. Electric vehicle demand estimation and charging station allocation using urban informatics[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2022, 106: 103264. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103264.

基金

国家重点研发计划(2023YFB4301900)
广东省科技计划(2023B1212060029)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/