基于物元可拓模型的重大交通基础设施项目组织韧性评估

张建明, 刘伟

交通运输研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2) : 96-106.

交通运输研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2) : 96-106. DOI: 10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2026.02.008
理论与方法

基于物元可拓模型的重大交通基础设施项目组织韧性评估

作者信息 +

Organizational Resilience Evaluation for Major Transportation Infrastructure Projects Based on Matter-Element Extension Model

  • ZHANG Jianming 1 ,  
  • LIU Wei 2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为了准确评定重大交通基础设施项目组织韧性等级,提升项目应对突发事件及风险的能力,引入韧性理论界定重大交通基础设施项目组织韧性的内涵。以韧性演进过程中的抵抗能力、吸收能力、恢复能力、适应能力为核心,结合高速公路线性工程环境暴露度高、多主体协同等特征,从人员、设备、管理、环境、应急等5个方面构建组织韧性评估体系。基于变权物元可拓理论,引入贴近度判定准则替代最大隶属度原则,构建改进的项目组织韧性评价模型,以提高韧性等级判定的准确性。通过模型评价结果识别影响项目组织韧性的关键指标,包括智能监测设备覆盖率、事故经验学习能力、信息反馈效率等,并从全周期管理、设备技术创新、专业人才培养、环境防御体系和应急联动机制等5个方面凝练提出韧性提升策略。最后,选取某市西二绕城高速公路项目进行实证应用。结果表明:该高速项目的组织韧性等级为Ⅱ级,属于较高韧性等级,但有偏向Ⅲ级中等韧性的趋势,评价结果与实际工程状况基本吻合,验证了模型的有效性。研究构建的融合智能建造要素的韧性指标体系,以及改进物元可拓模型中的权重动态调整和判别准则,可为重大交通基础设施项目的韧性评估与管理提供理论参考和实践工具。

Abstract

To accurately assess the organizational resilience grade of major transportation infrastructure projects and enhance their capability to cope with emergencies and risks, this paper defines the connotation of organizational resilience for such projects based on resilience theory. Focusing on the four core capacities in the resilience evolution process—resistance, absorption, recovery, and adaptation—and considering the characteristics of highway linear projects such as high environmental exposure and multi-agent collaboration, an organizational resilience evaluation system is constructed from five dimensions: personnel, equipment, management, environment, and emergency response.Based on the variable-weight matter-element extension theory, the closeness-degree criterion is introduced to replace the maximum membership degree principle, and an improved project organizational resilience evaluation model is constructed to enhance the accuracy of resilience grade determination. Based on the evaluation results, key indicators affecting project organizational resilience are identified, including intelligent monitoring equipment coverage rate, accident experience learning capability, and information feedback efficiency. Resilience enhancement strategies are summarized from five aspects: full lifecycle management, equipment technology innovation, professional talent development, environmental defense systems, and emergency linkage mechanisms. Finally, the West Second Ring Expressway project in a certain city is selected for empirical application. The results show that the organizational resilience grade of this expressway project is Level Ⅱ, indicating a relatively high level, but with a tendency toward Level Ⅲ. The evaluation outcome is generally consistent with the actual project conditions, verifying the model′s effectiveness. The study constructs a resilience indicator system incorporating smart construction elements and improves the dynamic weight adjustment and discrimination criteria of the matter-element extension model, providing theoretical references and practical tools for resilience evaluation and management of major transportation infrastructure projects.

关键词

韧性评价 / 改进变权物元可拓模型 / 重大交通基础设施项目 / 组织韧性 / 韧性提升策略

Key words

resilience evaluation / modified variable-weight matter-element extension model / major transportation infrastructure project / organizational resilience / resilience enhancement strategy

引用本文

导出引用
张建明, 刘伟. 基于物元可拓模型的重大交通基础设施项目组织韧性评估[J]. 交通运输研究. 2026, 12(2): 96-106 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2026.02.008
ZHANG Jianming, LIU Wei. Organizational Resilience Evaluation for Major Transportation Infrastructure Projects Based on Matter-Element Extension Model[J]. Transport Research. 2026, 12(2): 96-106 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2026.02.008
中图分类号: U491   

参考文献

[1]
刘娜娜, 周国华. 重大工程多主体协同合作利益分配及创新激励机制研究[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2023, 28(4):148-155.
[2]
盛昭瀚, 薛小龙, 安实. 构建中国特色重大工程管理理论体系与话语体系[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(4):2-16,51,195.
[3]
李平, 竺家哲. 组织韧性:最新文献评述[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(3):25-41.
[4]
HOLLING C. Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4(1):1-23.
[5]
BI W, SCHOOLING J, MACASKILL K. Assessing flood resilience of urban rail transit systems: Complex network modelling and stress testing in a case study of London[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2024, 134: 104263.DOI: 10.1016/J.TRD.2024.104263.
[6]
WAN J, XIE Q, FAN X. The impact of transportation and information infrastructure on urban productivity: Evidence from 256 cities in China[J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2024, 68: 384-392.
[7]
宝音图, 姚特, 徐茂臣, 等. 场地效应与贝叶斯网络在城市道路交通系统抗震韧性评估中的应用研究[J]. 地震工程学报, 2026, 48(1):91-102.
[8]
DAVIDSON K, NGUYEN T, BEILIN R, et al. The emerging addition of resilience as a component of sustainability in urban policy[J]. Cities, 2019,92:1-9.
[9]
WANG N, WU M, YUEN K. Modelling and assessing long-term urban transportation system resilience based on system dynamics[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2024, 109: 105548.DOI: 10.1016/J.SCS.2024.105548.
[10]
WEI M, XU J. Assessing road network resilience in disaster areas from a complex network perspective: A real-life case study from China[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2024, 100: 104167. DOI: 10.1016/J.IJDRR.2023.104167.
[11]
SUAREZ M, GOMEZ E, BENAYAS J, et al. Towards an urban resilience index: A case study in 50 spanish cities[J]. Sustainability, 2016, 8(8): 774-793.
[12]
WANG D, WANG P, LIU Y. The emergence process of construction project resilience: A social network analysis approach[J]. Buildings, 2022, 12(6):822-840.
[13]
MOHAMMED A, HARRIS I, SOROKA A, et al. A hybrid MCDM-fuzzy multi-objective programming approach for a G-resilient supply chain network design[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2019,127: 297-312.
[14]
袁必和, 杨家祺, 罗欣昱, 等. 基于模糊物元的化工园区安全韧性评估方法[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2023, 23(8):2624-2629.
[15]
纪柯柯, 陈坚, 吴改选, 等. 基于组合赋权——云模型的高速公路路网交通适应性评价[J]. 公路, 2021, 66(3):193-200.
[16]
汤洪霞, 郑静萱, 李梦笛, 等. 城市轨道交通系统暴雨风险演化网络特性及韧性提升策略[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2025, 69(8):64-71.
[17]
沈尧, 徐子寒, 冯韵洁. 多级洪涝灾害中上海市通勤时空结构韧性测度与优化研究[J]. 上海城市规划, 2025(2):40-50.
[18]
方立发, 柯愈贤, 王成, 等. 基于变权物元可拓模型的非煤矿山安全标准化等级评价[J]. 有色金属科学与工程, 2021, 12(5):96-102.
[19]
张勇, 屠宁雯, 陶骏杰. 道路交通网络脆弱性动态辨识方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2014, 14(5):74-81.
[20]
张阳, 刘佳, 梁攀, 等. 基于熵权可拓物元模型的桥梁检测指标综合评定[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 42(6):42-52.
[21]
张葭伊, 吕淑然, 张宇栋. 基于WSR-熵权物元可拓模型的古建筑火灾风险等级评价[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2020, 27(2):126-131.
[22]
MACASKI K, GUTHRIE P. Multiple interpretations of resilience in disaster risk management[J]. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2014, 18: 667-674.
[23]
白云海. 基于模糊综合评价法的城市轨道交通自动售检票系统更新项目后评价[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2021, 24(1):220-223.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/