基于不同蓄意攻击的城市群客运网络级联失效与鲁棒性研究

郑山江, 王敬宇, 李成兵, 高东梅

交通运输研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2) : 59-71.

交通运输研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2) : 59-71. DOI: 10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2026.02.005
理论与方法

基于不同蓄意攻击的城市群客运网络级联失效与鲁棒性研究

作者信息 +

Cascading Failure and Robustness of Urban Agglomeration Passenger Transport Networks under Different Deliberate Attack Strategies

  • ZHENG Shanjiang ,  
  • WANG Jingyu ,  
  • LI Chengbing * ,  
  • GAO Dongmei
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为精确评估城市群多层客运网络的鲁棒性,提出一种耦合过载失效与修正渗流理论的级联失效模型。首先,通过Space-L构建包括公路、铁路等子网与换乘关系的多层耦合网络,并通过融合站点容量与拓扑属性的方法为节点加权;其次,在负载-容量模型基础上,引入综合考虑全局、个体和局部3个维度的渗流失效判据,用以识别传统过载模型难以捕捉的结构性失效节点;再次,构建网络连通效率指标,以级联失效后各连通分量内节点数量占初始网络节点总数的比例量化网络服务功能的保持程度;最后,以呼包鄂乌城市群为对象,模拟在不同攻击强度(P=20%、P=70%)、策略(度中心性、PageRank、最大连通子图及加权修正介数攻击)及负载(低、中、高)下的改进后级联失效模型的鲁棒性。研究显示:低强度攻击主要引发过载失效,高强度攻击则转为渗流失效;4种攻击策略下,改进后的级联失效模型预测网络崩溃进程分别提前了47.4%, 45.5%, 50%, 59.5%;结构均衡的长途汽车网络对渗流失效敏感,而轴辐式的铁路网络对过载失效敏感。结果表明,该模型通过双重失效机理,能更精准评估网络鲁棒性,为城市群各层客运网络的差异化防护提供重要的决策支持。

Abstract

To accurately evaluate the robustness of multi-layer passenger transport networks in urban agglomerations, this study proposes a cascading failure model that couples overload failure with a modified percolation theory. First, a multi-layer coupled network incorporating sub-networks such as highways and railways, along with transfer relationships, is constructed using the Space-L method. Nodes are weighted by integrating station capacity with topological attributes. Second, based on the load-capacity model, a percolation failure criterion that comprehensively considers global, individual, and local dimensions is introduced to identify structural failure nodes that are difficult to capture using traditional overload-based models. Then, a network connectivity efficiency metric is constructed to quantify the degree to which network service functions are maintained, based on the proportion of nodes in each connected component after cascading failure to the total number of nodes in the initial network. Finally, the improved cascading failure model is simulated using the Hohhot-Baotou-Ordos-Ulanqab urban agglomeration as a case study, analyzing robustness under different attack intensities (P=20%, P=70%), strategies (degree centrality, PageRank, giant connected component, and weighted modified betweenness attacks), and load levels (low, medium, high). The research reveals that low-intensity attacks primarily trigger overload failures, whereas high-intensity attacks shift toward percolation failures. Under the four attack strategies, the improved cascading failure model predicts the network collapse process to occur 47.4%, 45.5%, 50%, and 59.5% earlier, respectively. Furthermore, the structurally balanced long-distance bus network is sensitive to percolation failure, while the hub-and-spoke railway network is sensitive to overload failure. The results indicate that by incorporating dual failure mechanisms, this model can more accurately assess network robustness, providing crucial decision-making support for the differentiated protection of various passenger transport layers within urban agglomerations.

关键词

城市群 / 复杂网络 / 蓄意攻击 / 渗流理论 / 级联失效 / 鲁棒性

Key words

urban agglomeration / complex network / deliberate attack / percolation theory / cascading failure / robustness

引用本文

导出引用
郑山江, 王敬宇, 李成兵, . 基于不同蓄意攻击的城市群客运网络级联失效与鲁棒性研究[J]. 交通运输研究. 2026, 12(2): 59-71 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2026.02.005
ZHENG Shanjiang, WANG Jingyu, LI Chengbing, et al. Cascading Failure and Robustness of Urban Agglomeration Passenger Transport Networks under Different Deliberate Attack Strategies[J]. Transport Research. 2026, 12(2): 59-71 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2026.02.005
中图分类号: U113   

参考文献

[1]
冯春, 朱倩, 于宝. 城市轨道交通网络鲁棒性仿真[J]. 计算机仿真, 2018, 35(10):182-186,461.
[2]
许葭, 宋守信, 翟怀远, 等. 基于复杂网络的北京地铁网络化发展分析[J]. 都市快轨交通, 2020, 33(5):88-93.
[3]
杨文东, 池雨林. 基于加权模体度的航线网络节点重要性评估指标[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2024, 48(4):53-64.
[4]
陈烨, 高悦尔, 沈晶晶. 基于复杂网络的快速公交-轨道交通站点分级研究[J]. 热带地理, 2023, 43(7):1234-1246.
[5]
聂士达, 李成兵, 贺博威, 等. 考虑城市内部服务网络的城市群综合客运网络抗毁性研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2025, 37(4):933-942.
[6]
李成兵, 李云飞, 吴鹏. 考虑时间特性的城市群客运网络抗毁性研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(9):2037-2045.
[7]
DING R, UJANG N, HAMID H, et al. Application of complex networks theory in urban traffic network researches[J]. Networks and Spatial Economics, 2019, 19(4): 1281-1317.
[8]
LI P, WANG B, SUN H, et al. A limited resource model of fault-tolerant capability against cascading failure of complex network[J]. The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter, 2008, 62(1): 101-104.
[9]
ZHANG C, MENDES J, ZHOU G, et al. Effect of interlayer dependence strength on continuous to discontinuous transitions in multi-layer networks[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2024, 185: 115151. DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115151.
[10]
WANG J, LAO S, HUANG S, et al. On the robustness of no-feedback interdependent networks[J]. Applied Sciences, 2018, 8(5): 835. DOI:10.3390/app8050835.
[11]
GUO J, XU J, HE Z, et al. Research on risk propagation method of multimodal transport network under uncertainty[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2021, 563: 125494. DOI:10.1016/j.physa.2020.125494.
[12]
JIA T, LIU W, LIU X. A cross-city exploratory analysis of the robustness of bus transit networks using open-source data[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2021, 580: 126133. DOI:10.1016/j.physa.2021.126133.
[13]
MEISAM A, SALEHI R, AGHABABAEI S. Detecting critical links of urban networks using cluster detection methods[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2019, 515: 288-298.
[14]
ZHANG J, WANG Z, WANG S, et al. Vulnerability assessments of weighted urban rail transit networks with integrated coupled map lattices[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2021, 214: 107707. DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107707.
[15]
ZHONG J, ZHANG F, YANG S, et al. Restoration of interdependent network against cascading overload failure[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2019, 514: 884-891.
[16]
XIAO J, ZHENG Y, WANG W, et al. Robustness analysis of a multimodal comprehensive transportation network from the perspectives of infrastructure and operation: A case study[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(4): 1902-1945.
[17]
交通部公路管理局. 汽车客运站级别划分和建设要求:JT/T 200—2004[S].
[18]
郝羽成, 李成兵, 魏磊. 考虑节点过载的复杂网络级联失效模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(10):2282-2287.

基金

国家自然科学基金(62063023)
内蒙古自然科学基金(2023MS05036)
内蒙古自治区高等学校青年科技英才支持计划(NJYT22099)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/