基于GAN-LSTM的通用机场冲突探测与智能解脱方法

陈博, 李梓明, 徐松涛, 叶一龙, 柯颖, 高峰, 王东

交通运输研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) : 70-79.

交通运输研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) : 70-79. DOI: 10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2026.01.007
理论与方法

基于GAN-LSTM的通用机场冲突探测与智能解脱方法

作者信息 +

Conflict Detection and Intelligent Resolution Method for General Aviation Airports Based on GAN-LSTM

  • CHEN Bo 1 ,  
  • LI Ziming 2 ,  
  • XU Songtao 3 ,  
  • YE Yilong 2 ,  
  • KE Ying 4 ,  
  • GAO Feng 5 ,  
  • WANG Dong 6, *
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为提升A类通用机场终端区在动态环境下的冲突探测与解脱能力,提出一种生成对抗网络(GAN)与长短期记忆网络(LSTM)深度融合的端到端冲突探测与智能解脱方法。该方法的核心创新包括:①构建双任务判别器架构,通过共享特征实现轨迹真伪判别与冲突概率预测;②设计物理约束引导的生成器,在满足飞行约束条件下生成多样化解脱轨迹,并通过多准则筛选最优方案;③提出自适应损失权重调整策略,动态平衡轨迹重建精度、对抗训练与冲突规避等多个目标。基于TrajAir数据集的综合实验表明,所提方法的冲突检测准确率达93.4%,解脱成功率达88%,显著优于所对比的传统几何规则方法;所生成轨迹误差小、符合飞行性能约束,体现出良好的实时性、准确性及决策灵活性。研究可为通用航空空中交通管理智能化提供技术参考,有望促进低空空域的安全高效运行。

Abstract

To enhance the conflict detection and resolution capability in dynamic environments of Category A general aviation terminal areas, this paper proposes an end-to-end conflict detection and intelligent resolution method based on the deep integration of Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). The core innovations of the method are: ①constructing a dual-task discriminator architecture that performs both trajectory authenticity discrimination and conflict probability prediction through shared feature representation; ②designing a physics-constrained generator that produces diverse resolution trajectories under flight performance constraints and selects the optimal solution via a multi-criteria screening mechanism; ③proposing an adaptive loss weight adjustment strategy to dynamically balance multiple objectives such as trajectory reconstruction accuracy, adversarial training stability, and conflict avoidance. Comprehensive experiments based on the TrajAir dataset show that the proposed method achieves a conflict detection accuracy of 93.4% and a resolution success rate of 88%, significantly outperforming conventional geometric rule-based methods. The generated trajectories exhibit small errors, comply with flight performance constraints, demonstrating the real-time capability, accuracy, and decision-making flexibility of the method. This study provides a feasible technical solution for intelligent air traffic management in general aviation, contributing to safer and more efficient low-altitude airspace operations.

关键词

通用航空 / 冲突探测 / 轨迹生成 / 生成对抗网络 / 深度学习

Key words

general aviation / conflict detection / trajectory generation / Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) / deep learning

引用本文

导出引用
陈博, 李梓明, 徐松涛, . 基于GAN-LSTM的通用机场冲突探测与智能解脱方法[J]. 交通运输研究. 2026, 12(1): 70-79 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2026.01.007
CHEN Bo, LI Ziming, XU Songtao, et al. Conflict Detection and Intelligent Resolution Method for General Aviation Airports Based on GAN-LSTM[J]. Transport Research. 2026, 12(1): 70-79 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2026.01.007
中图分类号: U8-9    V355   

参考文献

[1]
中国民用航空局. 2023年民航行业发展统计公报[Z]. 北京: 中国民用航空局, 2024.
[2]
MUELLER E, KOPARDEKAR P, GOODRICH K. Enabling airspace integration for high-density on-demand mobility operations[C]// 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Denver, USA: AIAA, 2017: 3086. DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-3086.
[3]
PATRIKAR J, MOON B, OH J, et al. Predicting like a pilot: Dataset and method to predict socially-aware aircraft trajectories in non-towered terminal airspace[C]// 2022 International Conference on Robotics and automation. Philadelphia, USA: IEEE, 2022: 2525-2531. DOI: 10.1109/ICRA46639.2022.9811972.
[4]
SCHUSTER W, PORRETTA M, OCHIENG W. High-accuracy four-dimensional trajectory prediction for civil aircraft[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2012, 116(1175): 45-66.
[5]
张军峰, 蒋海行, 武晓光, 等. 基于BADA及航空器意图的四维航迹预测[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2014, 49(3):553-558.
[6]
WIEST J, HÖFFKEN M, KREßEL U, et al. Probabilistic trajectory prediction with Gaussian mixture models[C]// 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. Madrid, Spain: IEEE, 2012: 141-146.
[7]
张邦楚, 杨朋坤, 梁毅雍, 等. 基于LSTM的空战无人机实时航迹预测[J]. 战术导弹技术, 2024(3):72-83.
[8]
WANG X, ZHANG X, LU Y, et al. Target trajectory prediction-based uav swarm cooperative for bird-driving strategy at airport[J]. Electronics, 2024, 13(19): 3868. DOI: 10.3390/electronics13193868.
[9]
ZHANG H, LIU Z. Four-dimensional aircraft trajectory prediction with a generative deep learning and clustering approach[J]. Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, 2025, 22(2): 90-102.
[10]
VASWANI A, SHAZEER N, PARMAR N, et al. Attention is all you need[C]// NIPS′17: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Long Beach, USA: Curran Associates Inc., 2017: 6000-6010.
[11]
IVANOVIC B, LEUNG K, SCHMERLING E, et al. Multimodal deep generative models for trajectory prediction: A conditional variational autoencoder approach[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2020, 6(2): 295-302.
[12]
CHEN Y, HU M, YANG L, et al. General multi-agent reinforcement learning integrating adaptive manoeuvre strategy for real-time multi-aircraft conflict resolution[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2023, 151: 104125. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2023.104125.
[13]
JIAO Z, LI M, CAI K, et al. A hierarchical game-theoretic based deep reinforcement learning approach for aircraft conflict resolution[C]// AIAA SCITECH 2026 Forum. Orlando, USA: AIAA, 2026: 0235. DOI:10.2514/6.2026-0235.
[14]
SUI D, XU W, ZHANG K. Study on the resolution of multi-aircraft flight conflicts based on an IDQN[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35(2): 195-213.
[15]
GOODFELLOW I, POUGET-ABADIE J, MIRZA M, et al. Generative adversarial nets[C]// NIPS′14: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Volume 2. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press, 2014: 2672-2680.
[16]
GUPTA A, JOHNSON J, LI F, et al. Social GAN: Socially acceptable trajectories with generative adversarial networks[C]// Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. Nashville, USA: IEEE, 2018: 2255-2264.
[17]
王宁, 梁晓龙, 李哲, 等. 面向UAV任务规划需求的航迹冲突消解方法[J/OL]. 火力与指挥控制.(2025-11-20)[2026-01-06].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/14.1138.TJ.20251119.2352.002.
[18]
邹杰, 李静博, 雷智. 基于改进人工势场法的无人机协商防撞算法[J/OL]. 电光与控制. (2025-12-25)[2026-01-06]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/41.1227.TN.20251215.1359.002.

基金

海南省重大科技计划项目(ZDKJ2021050)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/