铁热克提—贾登峪旅游公路沿线马鹿（Cervus canadensis）生境适宜性评价

杨艳刚; 王云; 陶双成; 孔亚平

doi:10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2025.03.008

PDF(5125 KB)

交通运输研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3) : 84-94. DOI: 10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2025.03.008

案例研究

铁热克提—贾登峪旅游公路沿线马鹿（Cervus canadensis）生境适宜性评价

作者信息 +

Habitat Suitability Assessment for Red Deer (Cervus canadensis) along Tielieketi-Jadengyu Tourism Highway

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

为评估阿尔泰山区旅游公路对典型食草动物马鹿迁移的阻隔影响程度，选择铁热克提—贾登峪旅游公路（简称“铁贾路”）沿线为研究区域，基于地形、植被、水源和人类干扰因子，构建生境适宜性评价准则，利用Linkage Mapper工具模拟马鹿迁移廊道，评估铁贾路对马鹿迁移的阻隔影响。结果显示，马鹿适宜生境占路域两侧各1.6 km缓冲区的41%~43%，集中于海拔1600~2000 m的山地疏林草原带；铁贾路穿越马鹿3处核心生境（K3+860—K10+240、K13+840—K16+180、K16+520—K22+840），与5处生态夹点和2处高价值廊道（K2+640、K13+420）相交，影响路段长度占研究路段总长的68.4%；2024—2025年红外相机监测结果验证了核心生境和廊道模拟的准确性。建议在K2+640、K13+420等高价值廊道和夹点处设置警示标志和采取交通管控等措施，以减轻阻隔效应，维持交通运营安全。研究结果为阿尔泰山区马鹿保护和公路安全运营提供了科学依据，可为阿尔泰山跨境保护地大型哺乳动物保护与基础设施建设协调发展提供参考。

Abstract

To evaluate the extent to which tourism highways in the Altai Mountains obstruct the migration of typical herbivorous animals (red deer), the area along the Tielieketi-Jadengyu tourism highway (referred to as "Tie-Jia Road") was selected as the study region. Based on factors such as topography, vegetation, water sources, and human disturbance, a habitat suitability evaluation criterion was established. Combined with the Linkage Mapper tool, red deer migration corridors were simulated to assess the obstruction impact of the Tie-Jia Road on its migration. The results indicate that suitable red deer habitats account for 41%~43% of the 1.6 km buffer zone on both sides of the road, primarily concentrated in the montane open forest-grassland belt at altitudes of 1600~2000 m. The Tie-Jia Road crosses three core habitats (K3+860—K10+240, K13+840—K16+180, K16+520—K22+840), intersecting five ecological pinch points and two high-value corridors (K2+640, K13+420), with the affected section comprising 68.4% of the total study road length. Infrared camera monitoring from 2024 to 2025 validated the accuracy of the simulated core habitats and corridors. It is recommended to install warning signs and implement traffic control measures at high-value corridors and pinch points such as K2+640 and K13+420, to mitigate obstruction effects and maintain traffic safety. This study provides a scientific basis for red deer conservation and highway operation safety in the Altai Mountains, offering reference for the coordinated development of large mammal conservation and infrastructure construction in transboundary protected areas of the Altai Mountains.

导出引用

杨艳刚, 王云, 陶双成, 等. 铁热克提—贾登峪旅游公路沿线马鹿（Cervus canadensis）生境适宜性评价[J]. 交通运输研究. 2025, 11(3): 84-94 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2025.03.008

YANG Yangang, WANG Yun, TAO Shuangcheng, et al. Habitat Suitability Assessment for Red Deer (Cervus canadensis) along Tielieketi-Jadengyu Tourism Highway[J]. Transport Research. 2025, 11(3): 84-94 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2025.03.008

中图分类号： U412.2 Q958.1

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	VAN DER REE R, SMITH D, GRILO C. Handbook of road ecology[M]. Oxford, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons. Press, 2015.

[2]	MCGREGOR R, BENDER D, FAHRIG L. Do small mammals avoid roads because of the traffic?[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 45(1): 117-123.

[3]	NOWAKOWSKI K, WAZNA A, KUREK P, et al. Long arm of motorway-The impact of fenced road on the mortality of European badgers[J]. Environmental Management, 2022, 69(2): 429-437.

[4]	GRILO C, MOLINA-VACAS G, FERNANDEZ-AGUILAR X, et al. Species-specific movement traits and specialization determine the spatial responses of small mammals towards roads[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning 2018, 169: 199-207.

[5]	ASCENSÃO F, CRISTINAM, MALO J, et al. Disentangle the causes of the road barrier effect in small mammals through genetic patterns[J]. PLoS ONE, 2016, 11(3): e0151500. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0151500.

[6]	CLEVENGER A, WALTHO N. Performance indices to identify attributes of highway crossing structures facilitating movement of large mammals[J]. Biological Conservation, 2005, 121(3): 453-464.

[7]	HALIK M, RYUICHI M, MANABU O, et al. Molecular phylogeography of the red deer (Cervus elaphus) populations in Xinjiang of China: Comparison with other Asian, European, and North American populations[J]. Zoological Science, 2002, 19(4): 485-495.

[8]	吕忠海, 冯源, 于沿泽, 等. 高食性重叠度对同域物种生境分离的影响——以马鹿和狍为例[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2020, 48(2):72-75.

[9]	张宇. 模糊层次分析法为基础的东北马鹿生境评价体系模型[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2010.

[10]	SUN Y, YU Y, GUO J, et al. The winter habitat selection of red deer (Cervus elaphus) based on a multi-scale model[J]. Animals, 2020, 10(12): 2454. DOI:10.3390/ani10122454.

[11]	刘鹏, 刘振生, 高惠, 等. 基于红外相机技术的贺兰山同域分布阿拉善马鹿和岩羊活动规律研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(24):9365-9372.

[12]	陈琛, 胡磊, 陈照娟, 等. 大兴安岭南段马鹿日活动节律的季节变化研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 33(4):55-62.

[13]	CALKOEN S, LEIGH-MOY K, CROMSIGT J, et al. The blame game: Using eDNA to identify species-specific tree browsing by red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a temperate forest[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2019, 451: 117483. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117483.

[14]	高惠, 滕丽微, 汪洋, 等. 阿拉善马鹿(Cervus alashanicus)生境适宜性评价[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(11):1-6.

[15]	艾萨江·图合提, 艾斯卡尔·买买提, 马合木提·哈力克, 等. 新疆哈密山区天山马鹿种群数量和冬季生境选择[J]. 动物学杂志, 2013, 48(6):841-851.

[16]	张明海, 萧前柱. 冬季马鹿采食生境和卧息生境选择的研究[J]. 兽类学报, 1990, 10(3):175-183.

[17]	田新民, 陈红, 钟林强, 等. 黑龙江省老爷岭南部穆棱林区马鹿种群分布数量及生境适宜性评价[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(14):5980-5989.

[18]	李言阔, 张明海, 蒋志刚. 基于生境可获得性的完达山地区马鹿(Cervus elaphus xanthopygus)冬季生境选择[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(10):4619-4628.

[19]	艾科拜尔·木哈塔尔, 热木图拉·阿卜杜克热木,马合木提·哈力克.基于生态位模型的艾比湖国家级自然保护区马鹿生境评价[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(11):3919-3925.

[20]	WU W, LI Y, HU Y, et al. Suitable winter habitat for Cervus elaphus on the southern slope of the Lesser Xing′an Mountains[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2016, 24(1): 20-29.

[21]	赵宇, 金崑. 内蒙古乌拉特鹅喉羚蒙古亚种夏季生境选择初步研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(3):115-123.

[22]	欧阳志云, 刘建国, 肖寒, 等. 卧龙自然保护区大熊猫生境评价[J]. 生态学报, 2001, 21(11):1869-1874.

[23]	徐卫华, 欧阳志云, 蒋泽银, 等. 大相岭山系大熊猫生境评价与保护对策研究[J]. 生物多样性, 2006, 14(3):223-231.

[24]	诸葛海锦, 林丹琪, 李晓文. 青藏高原高寒荒漠区藏羚生态廊道识别及其保护状况评估[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(8):2504-2510.

[25]	KOOL J, MOILANEN A, TREML E. Population connectivity: Recent advances and new perspectives[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2013, 28(2): 165-185.

[26]	陈文俐, 杨昌友. 中国阿尔泰山种子植物区系研究[J]. 植物分类与资源学报, 2000(4):371-378.

[27]	曹秋梅, 尹林克, 陈艳锋, 等. 阿尔泰山南坡种子植物区系特点分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2015, 35(7):1460-1469.

[28]	MAMTIMIN S. A survey on the ecological communities of bryophytes in the Kanas National Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2009, 26(5): 676-680.

[29]	刘辉, 姜广顺, 李惠. 北方冬季有蹄类动物4种数量调查方法的比较[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(9):3076-3086.

[30]	GÓMEZ J, HÓDAR J. Wild boars (Sus scrofa) affect the recruitment rate and spatial distribution of holm oak (Quercus ilex)[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 256(6): 1384-1389.

[31]	China Vegetation Map Editorial Committee. 1∶1 million vegetation data set in China[DB/OL]. Lanzhou: National Cryosphere Desert Data Center, 2020. [2025-05-23].

[32]	全国地理信息资源目录服务系统. 1∶25万全国基础地理数据库[DB/OL].(2025-01-15)[2025-05-23]. https://www.webmap.cn/commres.do?method=result25W.

[33]	陈利顶, 刘雪华, 傅伯杰. 卧龙自然保护区大熊猫生境破碎化研究[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(3):291-297

[34]	DUTTA T, SHARMA S, MCRAE B H, et al. Connecting the dots: Mapping habitat connectivity for tigers in central India[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2016, 16: 53-67.

[35]	郭庆华, 吴芳芳, 胡天宇, 等. 无人机在生物多样性遥感监测中的应用现状与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(11):1267-1278.