考虑客流分配的县域旅游巴士接驳路径规划模型——以平潭县域为例

林文强, 陈垚, 黄海南, 刘康琳

交通运输研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3) : 34-42.

PDF(1838 KB)
PDF(1838 KB)
交通运输研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3) : 34-42. DOI: 10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2025.03.004
理论与方法

考虑客流分配的县域旅游巴士接驳路径规划模型——以平潭县域为例

作者信息 +

County-Level Tourism Shuttle Bus Route Planning Model Considering Passenger Flow Allocation: A Case Study of Pingtan County

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

针对当前县域旅游巴士接驳服务存在的路径规划不合理、动态调度能力不足等突出问题,引入景区空间离散性、出游时效敏感性及运力资源有限性等特征约束,构建一种考虑客流分配的县域旅游巴士接驳路径规划模型。该模型以游客总乘车时长与旅游巴士总行程时长最小化为优化目标,并采用GUROBI优化器进行求解。随后,基于福建省平潭县的数据进行案例分析,通过权重系数实验探究目标间的协同优化效果,并开展运力利用率压力测试。结果表明:相较于点对点直达的基准方案,优化方案的游客总乘车时长仅增加0.6%,而车辆总行程时长降低23.2%;在运力缩减12.5%的极端条件下,优化方案仅以游客总乘车时长增长4%、车辆总行程时长增长8%的代价,实现了旅游巴士89.3%的峰值运力利用率,证明了模型在县域旅游场景下的可行性与鲁棒性。研究表明,采用该旅游巴士接驳路径规划模型,能高效配置县域旅游接驳资源,在保证游客出游体验的同时,兼顾旅游巴士运营成本的控制。

Abstract

To address prominent issues in current county tourism shuttle bus services, such as inefficient route planning and insufficient dynamic scheduling, a shuttle bus route planning model considering passenger flow allocation was developed. This model explicitly incorporates key constraints, including the spatial dispersion of attractions, tourist sensitivity to travel time, and limited fleet resources. The optimization objectives were defined as minimizing total passenger travel time and total vehicle operating time. Solving was performed using the GUROBI optimizer. Then, a case study based on data from Pingtan County, Fujian Province, demonstrated the model′s effectiveness. Experiments varying the weight coefficients investigated the collaborative optimization between objectives. Pressure tests on fleet utilization were also conducted. Results indicated that, compared to a point-to-point direct shuttle baseline solution, the optimized solution increased total passenger travel time by only 0.6%, while significantly reducing total bus operating time by 23.2%. Under the extreme condition of a 12.5% fleet reduction compared with regular scenarios, the solution achieved a high peak fleet utilization rate of 89.3%. This performance came at a modest cost: a 4% increase in total passenger travel time and an 8% increase in total bus operating time, demonstrating the model′s feasibility and robustness in county tourism contexts. The study shows that adopting this shuttle bus route planning model enables efficient allocation of county tourism transfer resources. It effectively balances controlling shuttle bus operating costs against ensuring a satisfactory travel experience for tourists.

关键词

县域旅游 / 旅游巴士 / 路径规划 / 客流分配 / GUROBI

Key words

county-level tourism / shuttle bus / route planning / passenger flow allocation / GUROBI

引用本文

导出引用
林文强, 陈垚, 黄海南, . 考虑客流分配的县域旅游巴士接驳路径规划模型——以平潭县域为例[J]. 交通运输研究. 2025, 11(3): 34-42 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2025.03.004
LIN Wenqiang, CHEN Yao, HUANG Hainan, et al. County-Level Tourism Shuttle Bus Route Planning Model Considering Passenger Flow Allocation: A Case Study of Pingtan County[J]. Transport Research. 2025, 11(3): 34-42 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2025.03.004
中图分类号: U492.4   

参考文献

[1]
2024年第六届全国县域旅游研究成果发布[EB/OL]. (2024-01-01)[2025-03-13]. http://www.hxbqly.com/hxbqly/vip_doc/29111437.html.
[2]
文化和旅游部, 国家发展改革委, 财政部, 等. 文化和旅游部,国家发展改革委,财政部,自然资源部,住房城乡建设部,交通运输部,农业农村部,应急管理部,国家消防救援局关于印发《关于推进旅游公共服务高质量发展的指导意见》的通知(文旅公共发〔2024〕41号)[EB/OL]. (2024-06-19)[2025-04-20]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202408/content_6966756.htm.
[3]
吴文智, 许建波. 县域文旅“热”:原因、挑战及发展路径[EB/OL]. (2024-10-08)[2025-03-04]. http://paper.people.com.cn/rmlt/pc/content/202410/08/content30029990.html.
[4]
刘培. 县域旅游公交线网规划方法研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2021.
[5]
黄鑫, 曾寻利, 李雅婷, 等. 考虑环境税的邮政快递企业多式联运路径优化问题[J]. 交通运输研究, 2021, 7(3):72-81.
[6]
陈刚, 苏銮, 李慧芳, 等. 常态化疫情防控背景下物资运输路径优化[J]. 交通运输研究, 2023, 9(1):96-104,114.
[7]
吴晓东, 王正鑫, 刘川平. 客户分级优先的即时配送路径规划方法[J]. 交通运输研究, 2024, 10(4):68-79.
[8]
LI J, GUO X, LU R, et al. Bus route design problem for rural tourism objectives: A multiobjective approach[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2022, 2022 (1): 1339598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1339598.
[9]
王峰, 杭波, 黄金洲, 等. 一种基于动态情境感知的旅游路径规划方法[J/OL]. 运筹学学报(中英文),1-14(2024-07-03)[2025-06-25]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/31.1732.o1.20240701.1514.012.html.
[10]
CHAI S, SHAN J, LONG C, et al. Analysis on the effect of intelligentization and improvement of tourist bus loops based on Markov chain decoupling[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 2022 (1): 9021129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9021129.
[11]
王建婷. 基于随机环境下的旅游公交线路优化设计研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2023.
[12]
代涛. 疏导型定制旅游公交线路优化研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2023.
[13]
高雍. 考虑服务水平的旅游公交路线优化设计问题研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2020.
[14]
JIA Z, HUANG D, LIU Z, et al. Multi-objective optimization for the sightseeing bus problem: Trade-off between tourists and operator[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2025, 269: 126341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.126341.
[15]
林心悦, 吴毅辉, 郑心怡, 等. 平潭综合实验区闽台农文旅融合发展对策分析[J]. 台湾农业探索, 2024, 46(1):8-12.
[16]
中华人民共和国建设部. 城市道路交通规划设计规范:GB 50220—95[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社,1995.
[17]
黎浩, 史春云, 范爽. 基于多源数据的乡村旅游地发展评价研究——以苏州市吴中区为例[J/OL]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2025:1-20.(2025-04-18)[2025-06-25]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.3513.S.20250418.1636.037.html.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(72101019)
北京市自然科学基金项目(L221020)

PDF(1838 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/