局部攻击情形下内河水路运输网络韧性测度与恢复策略

蒋军, 尹泓, 杨琛, 李火梅, 程璐, 付晓娜

交通运输研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 90-101.

交通运输研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 90-101. DOI: 10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2025.01.009

局部攻击情形下内河水路运输网络韧性测度与恢复策略

作者信息 +

Resilience Measurement and Recovery Strategies of Inland Waterway Transportation Network under Local Attack Scenario

  • JIANG Jun 1 ,  
  • YIN Hong 1, * ,  
  • YANG Chen 1 ,  
  • LI Huomei 1 ,  
  • CHENG Lu 1 ,  
  • FU Xiaona 2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为提升水路运输网络在受到攻击时的韧性,对局部攻击情形下内河水路运输网络的韧性和恢复策略进行研究。首先,考虑到水路运输网络的特点,基于复杂网络理论构建水路运输网络系统。然后,根据局部攻击的针对性,将船闸拥堵作为网络在受到局部攻击时的具体情景,并构建局部攻击情形下的网络韧性测度与恢复策略模型。最后,对重庆市水路运输网络进行仿真分析。研究结果表明,在船闸拥堵情形下网络韧性值并非均匀下降,而是受到失效边的具体情况和网络结构的自我适应能力的影响;在恢复阶段,随着恢复比例增加,韧性值最终可达到1,该恢复策略能够有效实现网络的完全恢复。通过对重庆市水路运输系统进行仿真分析,验证了韧性测度模型和恢复策略的科学性与有效性,为网络韧性恢复策略研究提供了清晰的框架和量化方法。

Abstract

In order to enhance the resilience of waterway transportation networks in the events of attacks, the resilience and recovery strategies of inland waterway transportation networks under local attack scenarios were investigated. Firstly, considering the characteristics of waterway transportation network, the waterway transportation network system was constructed based on complex network theory. Then, according to the pertinence of local attack, the lock congestion was taken as a specific scenario when the network was subject to local attack, and the network resilience measurement and recovery strategy model under local attack was constructed. Finally, the waterway transportation network in Chongqing was simulated and analyzed. The results show that the network resilience value does not decrease uniformly in the case of lock congestion, but is affected by the specific situation of the failed edge and the self-adaptive ability of the network structure; In the recovery phase, with the increase of the recovery ratio, the resilience value can eventually reach 1, and the recovery strategies can effectively realize the complete recovery of the network. By simulating and analyzing the waterway transportation system in Chongqing, the scientificity and effectiveness of the resilience measurement model and recovery strategies are verified, and a clear framework and quantitative method are provided for the study of network resilience recovery strategies.

关键词

内河运输 / 船闸拥堵 / 复杂网络 / 韧性测度 / 恢复策略

Key words

river transport / congestion at the locks / complex network / resilience measure / recovery strategy

引用本文

导出引用
蒋军, 尹泓, 杨琛, . 局部攻击情形下内河水路运输网络韧性测度与恢复策略[J]. 交通运输研究. 2025, 11(1): 90-101 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2025.01.009
JIANG Jun, YIN Hong, YANG Chen, et al. Resilience Measurement and Recovery Strategies of Inland Waterway Transportation Network under Local Attack Scenario[J]. Transport Research. 2025, 11(1): 90-101 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2025.01.009
中图分类号: U697.31   

参考文献

[1]
戈佳威, 王学锋, 万征, 等. 世界集装箱海运网络社团结构研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(6):231-236.
[2]
李慧, 甘浪雄, 郑元洲, 等. 港口水域船舶航路网络复杂度[J]. 中国航海, 2015, 38(3):94-98,130.
[3]
郑霞忠, 柯善钢, 陈星, 等. 基于复杂网络的内河船舶碰撞事故致因分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2023, 19(2):211-217.
[4]
MURRAY-TUITE P. A comparison of transportation network resilience under simulated system optimum and user equilibrium conditions[C]// Proceedings of the 2006 winter simulation conference. Monterey, USA: IEEE, 2006: 1398-1405.
[5]
COX A, PRAGER F, ROSE A. Transportation security and the role of resilience:A foundation for operational metrics[J]. Transport Policy, 2011, 18(2): 307-317.
[6]
OMER M, NILCHIANI R, MOSTASHARI A. Measuring the resilience of the trans-oceanic telecommunication cable system[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2009, 3(3): 295-303.
[7]
SULLIVAN J L, NOVAK D C, AULTMAN-HALL L, et al. Identifying critical road segments and measuring system-wide robustness in transportation networks with isolating links: A link-based capacity-reduction approach[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2010, 44(5): 323-336.
[8]
SOLTANI-SOBH A, HRASLIP K, STEVANOVIC A, et al. Evaluation of transportation network reliability during unexpected events with multiple uncertainties[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2016, 17: 128-136.
[9]
杨超, 唐鹏程, 郝旭宽, 等. 韧性交通建设实践与启示[J]. 综合运输, 2021, 43(8):134-138.
[10]
王兴隆, 石宗北, 陈仔燕. 空中交通网络模体识别及子图结构韧性评估[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7):558-568.
[11]
吕彪, 高自强, 刘一骝. 道路交通系统韧性及路段重要度评估[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(2):114-121.
[12]
马宝奎, 柴浩, 张志鹏. 后疫情时期城市轨道交通客流特征与韧性探讨[J]. 综合运输, 2022, 44(7):75-80.
[13]
OUYANG M, DUENAS-OSORIO L, MIN X. A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban in frastructure systems[J]. Structural Safety, 2012, 36: 23-31.
[14]
SHEFFI Y. The resilient enterprise: Overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage[M]. New York: Pearson Education India, 2005.
[15]
冒婷婷. 城市轨道交通网络结构的韧性识别与度量研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2021.
[16]
GOFFMAN W, NEWILL V A. Generalization of epidemic theory: An application to the transmission of ideas[J]. Nature, 1964, 204(4955): 225-228.
[17]
狄金茹. 交通复杂网络拓扑结构分析和流量预测[D]. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学, 2024.
[18]
赖强, 张宏昊, 王徐盱. 基于复杂网络理论的城市公交网络鲁棒性分析与优化[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2022, 58(10):249-254.
[19]
苏婉, 吕靖, 张聆晔. 韧性视角下我国原油进口海运网络恢复策略优化研究[J/OL]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2025:1-9. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.4520.U.20241016.1802.002.html.
[20]
重庆市交通运输委员会. 重庆市航道规划报告(2035年)(征求意见稿)[R]. 重庆: 重庆市交通运输委员会, 2024.

基金

重庆市教育委员会人文社科项目(23SKGH141)
重庆市自然科学基金面上项目(CSTB2024NSCQ-MSX1186)
重庆市研究生联合培养基地项目(JDLHPYJD2022002)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/