不同行驶条件下公交振动舒适性的影响因素研究

田坚, 强生杰, 王汤家, 刘国翔

交通运输研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 48-57.

交通运输研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 48-57. DOI: 10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2025.01.005

不同行驶条件下公交振动舒适性的影响因素研究

作者信息 +

Factors Influencing the Vibration Comfort of Public Transportation under Different Driving Conditions

  • TIAN Jian ,  
  • QIANG Shengjie * ,  
  • WANG Tangjia ,  
  • LIU Guoxiang
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为提升乘客乘坐舒适性,基于公交运动三轴加速度数据,采用有序Logistic回归分析探究了单向车道数、公交站点数、信号控制交叉口数、有无机非隔离带、有无公交专用道等外部环境因素对公交振动舒适性的影响,并采用二元Logistic回归分析首次量化评价了站台类型对舒适性的影响程度。分析发现:无机非隔离带的非常不舒适概率是有机非隔离带的3.5倍;随着单向车道数的增加,计权加速度均值降低了18%,舒适性显著降低;公交车在停靠港湾式站台时极不舒适概率是其在直线式站台的24.6倍。研究表明,设置机非隔离带可显著降低非机动车及行人对公交的影响,优化公交运行效率;增加单向车道数能够减少因频繁变道导致的交通延误,进而提升舒适性;特别是港湾式站台给乘客带来了极不舒适的乘坐体验,减少港湾式站台的设立是提升公交服务质量、增强公交吸引力的关键。

Abstract

In order to enhance passenger ride comfort, based on the three-axis acceleration data of bus movement, the effects of external environmental factors such as the number of one-way lanes, the number of bus stops, the number of signal-controlled intersections, the presence or absence of motor-nonmotor separation barrier, and the presence or absence of bus-only lanes on the vibration comfort of buses were explored by using ordered Logistic regression, and the influence degree of the type of station on the comfort was quantitatively evaluated for the first time by using binary Logistic regression. The analysis finds that: the probability of experiencing very uncomfortable conditions on roads without a barrier separating motor vehicle lanes from non-motorized lanes is 3.5 times higher than on roads with such a barrier; The mean weighted acceleration has decreased by 18% with the increase in the number of unidirectional lanes, which significantly reduces the comfort of ride; The probability of being very uncomfortable for buses stopping at a harbor-type platform is 24.6 times higher than for buses stopping at a straight-type platform. The study shows that the installation of barriers separating motor vehicle lanes from non-motorized lanes can significantly reduce the impact of non-motorized vehicles and pedestrians on buses and optimize the efficiency of bus operation; Increasing the number of unidirectional lanes can reduce traffic delays due to frequent lane changes, and thus improve the comfort of ride; In particular, it should be noted that harbor-type platforms bring passengers a very uncomfortable riding experience, and reducing the establishment of harbor-type platforms is the key to improving the quality of bus service and enhancing the attractiveness of buses.

关键词

公交振动舒适性 / 不同行驶条件 / Logistic回归 / 三轴加速度 / 站台类型

Key words

transit vibration comfort / different driving conditions / Logistic regression / triaxial accelerationion / station type

引用本文

导出引用
田坚, 强生杰, 王汤家, . 不同行驶条件下公交振动舒适性的影响因素研究[J]. 交通运输研究. 2025, 11(1): 48-57 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2025.01.005
TIAN Jian, QIANG Shengjie, WANG Tangjia, et al. Factors Influencing the Vibration Comfort of Public Transportation under Different Driving Conditions[J]. Transport Research. 2025, 11(1): 48-57 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2025.01.005
中图分类号: U491   

参考文献

[1]
DE OÑA J, DE OÑA R, DIEZ-MESA F, et al. A composite index for evaluating transit service quality across different user profiles[J]. Journal of Public Transportation, 2016, 19(2): 128-153.
[2]
PORTOULI E, KARASEITANIDIS G, LYTRIVIS P, et al. Public attitudes towards autonomous mini buses operating in real conditions in a Hellenic city[C]// 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). Los Angeles: IEEE, 2017: 571-576.
[3]
ISO. Mechanical vibration and shock—evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration: ISO 2631-1: 1997[S]. Geneve: IHS, 1997.
[4]
SEKULIĆ D, DEDOVIĆ V, RUSOV S, et al. Definition and determination of the bus oscillatory comfort zones[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2016, 53: 328-339.
[5]
BODINI I, LANCINI M, PASINETTI S, et al. Techniques for on-board vibrational passenger comfort monitoring in public transport[J]. Acta Imeko, 2014, 3(4): 32-37.
[6]
马万良. 基于智能手机的纯电动公交乘坐舒适性分析[J]. 汽车实用技术, 2022, 47(21):1-6.
[7]
杨阳, 丁予. 公交服务舒适性度量及其影响因素分析[C]// 2022世界交通运输大会(WTC2022)论文集. 北京: 人民交通出版社股份有限公司, 2022:527-536.
[8]
邵琪, 李园园. 基于乘员心率变异性的纯电动公交车乘坐舒适性主观评价研究[J]. 汽车实用技术, 2021, 46(23):5-7.
[9]
张琳, 周素红, 关美宝, 等. 城市公交车微环境对乘客舒适度的非线性影响[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(6):967-979.
[10]
MATERNINI G, CADEI M. A comfort scale for standing bus passengers in relation to certain road characteristics[J]. Transportation Letters, 2014, 6(3): 136-141.
[11]
云美萍, 王文. 基于智能手机的公交运行舒适性测度指标研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 45(8):1143-1149.
[12]
BARONE V, FESTA D, MONGELLI D, et al. Comfort Index CI (bus): A methodology to measure the comfort on board[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2018, 134: 439-444.
[13]
何民, 李沐轩, 税文兵, 等. 可靠性和舒适性对响应式定制公交线路设计的影响[J]. 公路交通科技, 2019, 36(5):145-151.
[14]
郭应时, 苏彦奇, 付锐, 等. 换道操作对智能车辆乘客舒适性的影响研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2022, 35(5):221-230.
[15]
BARABINO B, CONI M, OLIVO A, et al. Standing passenger comfort: A new scale for evaluating the real-time driving style of bus transit services[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2019, 20(12): 4665-4678.
[16]
杨宇航, 陈国俊, 张抒扬, 等. 基于三轴加速度的公交乘坐振动舒适性研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2021, 45(5):874-879.

基金

国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(72001081)
江西省自然科学基金资助项目(20212BAB214015)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/