基于本体和产生式规则的自主式交通系统演化研究

庹昊南, 刘佑, 付强, 何明帆, 唐进君, 熊宸

交通运输研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (4) : 46-54.

交通运输研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (4) : 46-54. DOI: 10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2023.04.004
理论与方法

基于本体和产生式规则的自主式交通系统演化研究

作者信息 +

Evolution of Autonomous Transportation System Based on Ontology and Production Rules

  • TUO Haonan 1 ,  
  • LIU You 1 ,  
  • FU Qiang 1 ,  
  • HE Mingfan 1 ,  
  • TANG Jinjun 1 ,  
  • XIONG Chen 2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为探究自主式交通系统(Autonomous Transportation System, ATS)的演化机理,基于本体的知识建模与基于产生式规则的知识推理分析自主式交通系统要素的相互作用及演化特征。首先,收集交通领域文本数据,经预处理后形成语料库。构建狄利克雷分布(Latent Dirichlet Allocation, LDA)模型和BERT-BiLSTM-CRF模型用于从语料库中抽取自主式交通的概念和实例。其次,为构建自主式交通的知识模型,基于本体理论,定义概念间的语义关系并填充实例。再次,依据知识模型构建了交叉口的自动驾驶场景要素网络,并基于产生式规则的知识推理方法,设立了3条规则进行推理。最后,计算了推理前后要素网络指标,包括关系数量、平均度、平均路径长度和图密度。结果表明,该知识推理方法挖掘了463条隐含关系,平均度由1.418增至2.347,平均路径长度由1.940减小为1.745,图密度由0.003上升为0.005。借助知识推理方法,总结出自主式交通系统的演化机理,即网络形态从稀疏发展为稠密、网络效率逐步提升的过程。

Abstract

In order to explore the evolution mechanism of the Autonomous Transportation System (ATS), this paper analyzed the interactions and evolution features of ATS elements based on know-ledge modeling of ontology and knowledge reasoning of production rules. First, text data in the transportation domain was collected and pre-processed to form a corpus. Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model and BERT-BiLSTM-CRF model were built to extract concepts and instances of ATS from the corpus. Second, semantic relations among concepts were defined and instances were populated based on ontology theory to construct a knowledge model of ATS. Third, the element network for automatic driving at intersections was created according to the knowledge model, and three rules based on the knowledge reasoning of production rules were set up to reason the element network. Finally, the element network metrics before and after reasoning were calculated, including the number of relations, average degree, average path length, and graph density. The results show that the knowledge reasoning method mines 463 implicit relations, the average degree increases from 1.418 to 2.347, the average path length decreases from 1.940 to 1.745, and the graph density ascends from 0.003 to 0.005. By using knowledge reasoning, this paper summarized the evolution mechanism of ATS, i.e., the process of development for network morphology evolving from sparse to dense and the gradual increase in network efficiency.

关键词

交通信息工程 / 自主式交通 / 演化 / 本体 / 产生式规则 / 知识建模与推理

Key words

traffic information engineering / autonomous transportation / evolution / ontology / production rules / knowledge modeling and reasoning

引用本文

导出引用
庹昊南, 刘佑, 付强, . 基于本体和产生式规则的自主式交通系统演化研究[J]. 交通运输研究. 2023, 9(4): 46-54 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2023.04.004
TUO Haonan, LIU You, FU Qiang, et al. Evolution of Autonomous Transportation System Based on Ontology and Production Rules[J]. Transport Research. 2023, 9(4): 46-54 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2023.04.004
中图分类号: U491.2   

参考文献

[1]
魏伟, 郑来, 蔡铭. 面向自主式交通的智能交通系统用户需求研究[J]. 交通科技与经济, 2022, 24(2):1-7.
[2]
XU Q, LI K Q, WANG J Q, et al. The status, cha-llenges, and trends: An interpretation of technology roadmap of intelligent and connected vehicles in China (2020)[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles, 2022, 5(1): 1-7.
[3]
TIAN D, GONG W, LIU W, et al. Applications of intelligent computing in vehicular networks[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles, 2018, 1(2): 66-76.
[4]
张可, 齐彤岩, 刘冬梅, 等. 中国智能交通系统(ITS)体系框架研究进展[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2005(5):10-15.
[5]
蔡铭, 熊宸, 肖尧, 等. 自主式交通系统构成理论基础[M]. 广州: 中山大学出版社, 2022.
[6]
王庆云. 中国交通发展的演进过程及问题思考[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2007, 7(1):1-11.
[7]
王庆云, 毛保华, 张国伍. 我国交通运输系统工程的演化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5):2-11.
[8]
颜姜慧. 智慧交通系统自组织演化视角下智能汽车发展路径研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2020.
[9]
赵学彧, 杨家其, 彭亚美. 城市轨道交通与地面公交竞合关系演化机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(3):756-764.
[10]
BIHAM O, MIDDLETON A A, LEVINE D. Self-organization and a dynamical transition in traffic-flow models[J]. Physical Review A, 1992, 46(10): R6124.
[11]
YOUNES M B, BOUKERCHE A. A performance evaluation of an efficient traffic congestion detection protocol (ECODE) for intelligent transportation systems[J]. Ad Hoc Networks, 2015, 24: 317-336.
[12]
马庆禄, 牛圣平, 曾皓威, 等. 网联环境下混合交通流偶发拥堵演化机理研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(5):97-106.
[13]
SUN X Q, WANDELT S, ZHANG A M. How did COVID-19 impact air transportation? A first peek through the lens of complex networks[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2020, 89: 101928.
[14]
邵志国, 韩传峰, 孟令鹏, 等. 基于Logistic的区域交通基础设施生态系统演化模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(11):2918-2928.
[15]
GRUBER T R. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications[J]. Knowledge Acquisition, 1993, 5(2): 199-220.
[16]
张采芳, 张睿卓, 林爱武. 地理本体在动态交通系统中的应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2018(3):134-138,146.
[17]
FERNANDEZ S, HADFI R, ITO T, et al. Ontology-based architecture for intelligent transportation systems using a traffic sensor network[J]. Sensors, 2016, 16(8): 1287.
[18]
黄珂萍, 蒋昌俊. 基于本体的城市交通的知识分析和推理[J]. 计算机科学, 2007(3):192-196.
[19]
BARRACHINA J, GARRIDO P, FOGUE M, et al. VEACON: A vehicular accident ontology designed to improve safety on the roads[J]. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2012, 35(6): 1891-1900.
[20]
阳其凯, 王坚, 凌卫青. 基于本体和云服务的交通异构数据集成方法研究[J]. 高技术通讯, 2015, 25(7): 694-702.
[21]
王笑京, 齐彤岩, 蔡华. 智能交通系统体系框架原理与应用[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2004.
[22]
BLEI D M, NG A, JORDAN M I. Latent dirichlet allocation[J]. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003(3): 993-1022.
[23]
EHEK R, SOJKA P. Software framework for topic modelling with large corpora[C]// Proceedings of the LREC 2010 Workshop on New Challenges for NLP Frameworks. Valletta, Malta: ELRA, 2010: 45-50.
[24]
曾子明, 陈思语. 基于LDA与Bert-BiLSTM-Attention模型的突发公共卫生事件网络舆情演化分析[J/OL]. 情报理论与实践.(2023-04-12)[2023-04-13]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1762.G3.20230412.0904.002.html.
[25]
王笑京, 齐彤岩, 蔡华. 智能交通系统体系框架原理与应用[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2004.
[26]
吴伟, 刘洋, 刘威, 等. 自动驾驶环境下交叉口车辆路径规划与最优控制模型[J]. 自动化学报, 2020, 46(9):1971-1985.
[27]
《中国公路学报》编辑部. 中国汽车工程学术研究综述·2017[J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30(6):1-197.
[28]
MIHALCEA R, TARAU P. Textrank: bringing order into text[C]// Proceedings of the 2004 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Barcelona, Spain:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2004: 404-411.
[29]
HUANG Z H, XU W, YU K. Bidirectional LSTM-CRF models for sequence tagging[J/OL]. ArXiv, 2015(8): 01991. [2023-04-13]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.01991.
[30]
LI D Y, LI Y, YANG J Z, et al. Dependency syntax guided BERT-BiLSTM-GAM-CRF for Chinese NER[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2022, 196: 116682.
[31]
FRANCE-MENSAH J, O'BRIEN W J. A shared ontology for integrated highway planning[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2019, 41: 100929.
[32]
CHEN T, ZHANG Y, QIAN X, et al. A knowledge graph-based method for epidemic contact tracing in public transportation[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2022, 137: 103587.
[33]
HORROCKS I, PATEL-SCHNEIDER P F, BOLEY H, et al. SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML[J]. W3C Member submission, 2004, 21(79): 1-31.

基金

国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFB1600400)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/