全寿命视角下的公共停车场PPP项目成本效益分析

PDF(5286 KB)

交通运输研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2) : 20-29.

韩艳，张甜甜，方靖

作者信息 +

Cost-Benefit Analysis of PPP Project of Public Parking Lot from Perspective of Life Cycle

Han Yan, Zhang Tian-tian, Fang Jing

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

为了保障政府和社会资本合作（Public-Private Partnership, PPP）的公共停车场项目合理的成本效益，应用全寿命周期理论，系统梳理了其成本效益组成结构及影响因素，建立了不同PPP模式下不同建筑形式的停车场（地下停车场、停车楼和机械式停车场）固定成本模型、年运营收入与费用模型和基于动态投资回收期的成本效益分析模型；探讨用地、停车收费及金融政策对不同PPP模式、不同建筑形式公共停车场动态投资回收期的影响，并以居住类公共停车场为例开展案例分析。结果表明：当内部收益率和收费价格一定时，对于机械式停车场和地下停车场，TBT（Transfer-Build-Transfer）模式动态投资回收期最短，其次为BOT（Build-Operate-Transfer）模式和BOO （Build-Own-Operate）模式；对于停车楼，BOT模式动态投资回收期最短，其次为TBT模式和BOO模式；当附属商业面积比例为20%时，不同建筑形式的居住类公共停车场动态投资回收期均小于15年，满足社会资本目标；土地价格一定时，增加附属商业面积比例可以使动态投资回收期缩短0.4~10年；转让停车场规模为小型或中型时，转让车位价格小于21.21万元，社会资本均可在15年内收回成本。

Abstract

To ensure the reasonable cost-benefit of Public-Private Partnership(PPP) projects of public parking lots, based on the life cycle theory, the cost-benefit structure and influencing factors of PPP project of public parking lot were analyzed. The fixed cost model, annual operating income and expenses model and cost-benefit model based on dynamic investment payback period of different architectural forms including underground parking lot, parking buildings and mechanical tridimensional garage, under different PPP modes were established. The impacts of land use policy, parking charge policy and financial policy on dynamic investment payback period under different PPP modes and different architectural forms of public parking lots were discussed. Taking a residential public parking lots as an example, the results showed that when the internal return rate and parking price were fixed, for mechanical tridimensional garage and underground parking lot, the dynamic investment payback period of Transfer-Build-Transfer(TBT) mode was the shortest, followed by Build-Operate-Transfer(BOT) mode and Build-Own-Operate(BOO) mode; for parking buildings, the dynamic investment payback period of BOT mode was the shortest, followed by TBT mode and BOO mode. When the proportion of subsidiary commercial area was raised to 20%, the dynamic investment payback period of residential public parking lots with different building forms were all below 15 years, which can meet the demand of the private sector. When the land price was fixed, increasing the proportion of subsidiary commercial area can shorten dynamic investment payback period by 0.4~10 years; when the transferred parking lot was small or medium-sized, and the transferred price of parking space was less than 212.1 thousand yuan, the private sector can recover costs within 15 years.

导出引用

韩艳, 张甜甜, 方靖. 全寿命视角下的公共停车场PPP项目成本效益分析[J]. 交通运输研究. 2020, 6(2): 20-29

Han Yan, Zhang Tian-tian, Fang Jing. Cost-Benefit Analysis of PPP Project of Public Parking Lot from Perspective of Life Cycle[J]. Transport Research. 2020, 6(2): 20-29

参考文献

[1]Wang R, Yuan Q. Parking Practices and Policies under Rapid Motorization: The Case of China[J].Transport Policy, 2013, 30(3): 109-116.
[2]Yang S X, Zhu X G, Guo W S. Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Concentrated Solar Power in China[J]. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2018, 2018: 1-11.
[3]Ng S T, Xie J Z, Cheung Y K, et al. A Simulation Model for Optimizing the Concession Period of Public-Private Partnerships Schemes[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2007, 25(8): 791-798.
[4]谢志明，陈先龙. 城市停车场建设投资的综合成本比较分析[J]. 华中科技大学学报（城市科学版），2005，22（1）：102-107.
[5]关宏志，严海，王兆荣，等. 停车产业化政策分析及建议——以北京市为例[J]. 城市交通，2009，7（2）：7-12.
[6]Wang Y L, Wang X, Zhang M C. Current Situation and Analysis of Parking Problem in Beijing[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 137: 777-785.
[7]关宏志，宋茂灿，卢笙. 停车场成本效益分析方法[J]. 北京工业大学学报，2018，44（2）：276-282.
[8]Anderson S P, Palma A D. The Economics of Pricing Parking[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2004, 55(1): 1-20.
[9]Thanh T T M, Friedrich H. Legalizing the Illegal Parking, a Solution for Parking Scarcity in Developing Countries[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2017, 25: 4950-4965.
[10]朱梦琦. 城市市区停车场项目PPP融资模式研究[J]. 现代商业，2016（15）：49-50.
[11]吴孝灵，周晶，彭以忱，等. 基于公私博弈的PPP项目政府补偿机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学，2013，21（S1）：198-204.
[12]Cheah C Y J, Liu J. Valuing Governmental Support in Infrastructure Projects as Real Options Using Monte Carlo Simulation[J]. Construction Management and Economics, 2006, 24(5): 545-554.
[13]董小林，潘望，宋赪，等. 基于全寿命周期理论的公路项目环境成本分析[J]. 中国公路学报，2014，27（10）：104-121.
[14]住房和城乡建设部. 城市用地分类与规划建设用地标准：GB 50137—2011[S]. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2011.
[15]缪立新，杨宽. 城市经营性停车场投资机会分析[J]. 城市规划，2001，25（10）：65-67，71.
[16]王婷静. 西安市公共停车场TBTB融资模式研究[D]. 西安：长安大学，2007.
[17]潘福全，罗淑兰，张辉，等. PPP模式在城市公共停车场建设中的应用[J]. 交通企业管理，2016，31（12）：49-52.
[18]Han Y, Zhang T, Li W. Operation Mode Selection Model of PPP Project Construction of Public Parking Lot Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process[C]// CICTP 2018: Intelligence, Connectivity and Mobility-Proceedings of the 18th COTA International Conference of Transportation Professionals. Beijing: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2018: 2412-2422.
[19]汪才华. 公共停车场PPP项目公开招标采购案例研究[J]. 招标与投标，2016（11）：6-14.
[20]Fleming J, Emery D R, Finnerty J D. Corporate Financial Management[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1997, 52(4): 1742.
[21]Milis K, Mercken R. The Use of the Balanced Sorecard for the Evaluation of Information and Communication Technology Projects[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2004, 22(2): 87-97.
[22]王晶香，张雪梅. 建设项目财务评价指标——投资回收期浅析[J]. 建筑管理现代化，2004（2）：13-16.
[23]王建军，金书鑫，李维佳，等. 多方综合效益最大化的社会公共停车场停车收费定价方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报，2017，17（2）：126-135.
[24]北京市发展和改革委员会办公室. 关于鼓励社会资本参与机动车停车设施建设的意见[EB/OL].（2014-12-30）[2019-10-12].
[25]福建省住房和城乡建设厅，福建省财政厅. 关于印发鼓励社会资本投资城市公共停车场PPP工程包的实施方案的通知（闽建城〔2017〕2号）[EB/OL]. (2017-01-17) [2019-10-12].
[26]住房和城乡建设部，国土资源部. 关于进一步完善城市停车场规划建设及用地政策的通知（建城〔2016〕193号）[EB/OL]. (2016-08-31)[2019-10-12].