年龄差异下的拉萨朝圣人群出行行为特征分析

程刚,旺宗

交通运输研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (5) : 50-56.

PDF(1371 KB)
PDF(1371 KB)
交通运输研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (5) : 50-56.
专题

年龄差异下的拉萨朝圣人群出行行为特征分析

  • 程刚,旺宗
作者信息 +

Travel Behavior Characteristics of Pilgrimage Groups in Lhasa under Age Differences

  • CHENG Gang and Wang zong
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为了更好地了解朝圣人群的出行行为特征,进而引导高原居民低碳化出行,从拉萨居民出行样本数据库中抽取出2 686 条出行信息,建立朝圣人群出行样本集。在应用层次分析法对朝圣人群出行影响因素进行判定的基础上,对不同年龄阶段的朝圣人群的出行行为特征进行了分析。结果表明:年龄是影响朝圣人群出行的核心内在因素,不同年龄阶段的朝圣人群出行行为特征呈现出了不同的变化趋势;24~48 岁年龄段的朝圣人群出行频率最高,达到2.43 次/d;61~65 岁年龄段的朝圣人群朝圣活动的出行距离最长,其平均转经绕行距离达到了7.8km;出行时间随着朝圣人群年龄的增长逐渐增长,符合人体自然衰老的过程;公共汽车是不同年龄段朝圣人群出行的首选,其中66~70 岁年龄段朝圣人群选择公交出行的比例最高,达到63%;对60 岁以上的人群实施免费乘坐公共汽车的惠民政策对朝圣人群的出行产生了良好的引导效果。

Abstract

To understand pilgrimage groups’travel behavior characteristics and guide plateau residents’low-carbon travel, 2 686 pieces of travel information were extracted from Lhasa resident travel sample database and the travel sample set for pilgrimage groups was established. Then, the main factors affecting the pilgrimage groups’travel behaviors were judged based on AHP(Analytical Hierarchy Process) and the travel behavior characteristics of pilgrims under different ages were analyzed. The results indicated that age was the core intrinsic factor affecting the pilgrimage groups, and there were obvious differences in travel behaviors of pilgrims under different ages. The age of 24~48 was the most frequent stage for pilgrims to travel, the frequency of pilgrims traveling in this age group was 2.43 times per day. Pilgrims aged 61 to 65 had the longest travel distance, with an average length of 7.8 km for warp-twisting. The travel time increased with age, which was in line with the natural aging process of human body. Buses were the preferred choice for pilgrimage groups under all ages, with a peak selection rate of 63% in the age of 66~70. The policy of free bus rides for people over the age of 60 had a positive impact on pilgrims’travel.

关键词

影响因素 / 年龄差异 / 朝圣人群 / 出行行为 / 特征分析

Key words

influencing factor / age difference / pilgrimage group / travel behavior / characteristic analysis

引用本文

导出引用
程刚,旺宗. 年龄差异下的拉萨朝圣人群出行行为特征分析[J]. 交通运输研究. 2018, 4(5): 50-56
CHENG Gang and Wang zong. Travel Behavior Characteristics of Pilgrimage Groups in Lhasa under Age Differences[J]. Transport Research. 2018, 4(5): 50-56

参考文献

[1] 张虎生. 青藏高原转经朝圣习俗的群体行为特征[J]. 西藏大学学报(社会科学版),2013,28(1):196-201.
[2] 程刚. 基于雪顿节出行的拉萨市公共交通组织研究[J]. 公路,2016,61(1):162-166.
[3] 王雨佳,何保红,郭淼,等. 老年人日常家务活动出行模式及影响因素[J]. 交通运输研究,2018,4(2):7-15.
[4] 张萍,邓能静,蒋瑶瑶. 居民非工作活动和出行的结构方程建模[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2017,45(9):1311-1318.
[5] 张宏新. 深圳市老年人出行方式和出发时刻选择行为研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2015.
[6] 冯建喜,杨振山. 南京市城市老年人出行行为的影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展,2015,34(12):1598-1608.
[7] 董仁,韩汶,李琳,等. 城市老年人出行行为影响因素研究[J]. 昆明理工大学学报(自然科学版),2015,40(4):38-45.
[8] 张萌,孙全欣,陈金川,等. 北京市女性出行行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息,2008,8(2):19-26.
[9] 杨琦,杨云峰,袁华智,等. 农村居民出行目的地选择行为模型与影响因素分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报,2013,13(5):83-90.
[10] 陈红,甘佐贤,贺彧婷,等. 进城务工人员出行行为及其弹性度分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2016,35(2):120-125.
[11] KANG H J, SCOTT D M. Impact of Different Criteria orIdentifying Intra-Household Interactions: A Case Study of Household Time Allocation[J]. Transportation, 2011, 38(1): 81-99.
[12] MOSA A I, ESAWEY M E. An Investigation of Household Interactions in Daily In-Home and Out-of-Home Maintenance Activity Participation and Social Behavior in Cairo, Egypt[J]. Transportation Letters the International Journal of Transportation Research, 2013, 5(4): 201-212.
[13] WHEATLEY D. Travel-to-Work and Subjective Well-Being: A Study of UK Dual Career Households[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2014, 39: 187-196.
[14] HSU H P, SAPHORES J D. Impacts of Parental Gender and Attitudes on Children’s School Travel Mode and Parental Chauffeuring Behavior: Results for California Based on the 2009 National Household Travel Survey[J]. Transportation, 2014, 41(3): 543-565.
[15] PAOLA CAROLINA BUENO, GOMEZ J, PETERS J, et al. Understanding the Effects of Transit Benefits on Employees’Travel Behavior: Evidence from the New York-New Jersey Region[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017, 99: 1-13.
[16] CHENG G, ZHAO S Z, HUANG D. Understanding the Effects of Improving Transportation on Pilgrim Travel Behavior: Evidence from the Lhasa, Tibet, China[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(10): 3528.
[17] CHENG G, XU W, RONG Y. Managing Seasonable Differences in Passengers’Traffic Volume by Lhasa Railway Station[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 505-506: 592-596.
[18] 中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室. 西藏发展道路的历史选择[Z]. 北京:中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室,2015.

基金

教育部人文社会科学研究项目(17YJAZH010)

PDF(1371 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/