基于Kano-QFD模型的顺风车平台优化设计研究

汪佳禾, 张雨彤, 王锦诚, 王超

交通运输研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3) : 85-93.

交通运输研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3) : 85-93. DOI: 10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2022.03.009

基于Kano-QFD模型的顺风车平台优化设计研究

作者信息 +

Optimization Design of Ride-sharing Platform Based on Kano-QFD Model

  • WANG Jia-he 1 ,  
  • ZHANG Yu-tong 1 ,  
  • WANG Jin-cheng 2 ,  
  • WANG Chao 1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

顺风车作为低碳出行方式有助于“双碳”目标的实现,为确定能有效提升用户满意度的顺风车平台设计要求,首先通过问卷调查提取二级用户需求,运用Kano模型将用户需求分类并求得需求重要度。然后,结合质量功能展开(Quality Function Deployment, QFD)分析得出12项顺风车平台的功能设计要求,构建用户需求与平台设计要求的关系矩阵并确定各项设计要求的重要度排序。研究结果显示,重要度最高的3个用户需求为:希望有固定的拼友和司机、司机和乘客可双向选择、希望同乘的司机和乘客有较高的素质和信用;最关键的设计要求为“通勤圈”(社群小组)、双向选择与双向互评打分。最后,建议顺风车平台加入社群资讯功能,形成双向选择、双向互评机制,从而增加用户的使用意愿和满意度。

Abstract

As a low-carbon travel mode, ride-sharing helps to achieve carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals. In order to determine the effective functional design for the ride-sharing platform to improve user satisfaction, firstly, the secondary needs of users were extracted through a questionnaire survey, and the Kano model was used to classify the user needs and obtain the importance of the needs. Then, combined with QFD(Quality Function Deployment), 12 functional designs of the ride-sharing platform were concluded, the relationship matrix between the user needs and the design requirements was constructed, and the importance order of each design requirement was determined. The research results showed that the three user needs with the highest importance were: hoping to have fixed peers and drivers, two-way selection of drivers and passengers, and hoping that drivers and passengers who take the same ride have high quality and credit, whereas the most critical design requirements were "commuting circle"(community group), two-way choice and two-way mutual evaluation and scoring. Finally, it is recommended that the ride-sharing platform add the community information function, and form two-way selection and two-way mutual evaluation mechanism, so as to increase users' willingness to use and satisfaction.

关键词

顺风车 / Kano模型 / 质量功能展开 / 用户需求 / 平台优化

Key words

ride-sharing / Kano model / QFD(Quality Function Deployment) / user needs / platform optimization

引用本文

导出引用
汪佳禾, 张雨彤, 王锦诚, . 基于Kano-QFD模型的顺风车平台优化设计研究[J]. 交通运输研究. 2022, 8(3): 85-93 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2022.03.009
WANG Jia-he, ZHANG Yu-tong, WANG Jin-cheng, et al. Optimization Design of Ride-sharing Platform Based on Kano-QFD Model[J]. Transport Research. 2022, 8(3): 85-93 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2022.03.009

参考文献

[1]
李兴华, 冯飞宇, 成诚, 等. 网约拼车服务选择偏好分析及建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022,52(3):578-584.
[2]
SHAHEEN S A, CHAN N D, GAYNOR T. Casual carpooling in the San Francisco Bay Area: understanding user characteristics, behaviors, and motivations[J]. Transport Policy, 2016, 51: 165-173.
[3]
MOHAMED M J, RYE T, FONZONE A. Operational and policy implications of ridesourcing services: a case of Uber in London, UK[J]. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2019, 7(4): 823-836.
[4]
BROWN A E. Who and where rideshares? Rideshare travel and use in Los Angeles[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2020, 136: 120-134.
[5]
DE SOUZA SILVA L A, DE ANDRADE M O, MAIA M L A. How does the ride-hailing systems demand affect individual transport regulation?[J]. Research in Transportation Economics, 2018, 69: 600-606.
[6]
WANG M, MARTIN E, SHAHEEN S. Carsharing in Shanghai, China: analysis of behavioral response to local survey and potential competition[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012, 2319(1): 86-95.
[7]
CACHON G P. A research framework for business models: what is common among fast fashion, e-tailing, and ride sharing?[J]. Management Science, 2020, 66(3): 1172-1192.
[8]
BIMPIKIS K, CANDOGAN O, SABAN D. Spatial pricing in ride-sharing networks[J]. Operations Research, 2019, 67(3): 744-769.
[9]
姚荣涵, 梁亚林, 刘锴, 等. 考虑合乘的共享自动驾驶汽车选择行为实证分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020,20(1):228-233.
[10]
SOLTYS K A. Toward an understanding of carpool formation and use[R]. Toronto: University of Toronto, 2009.
[11]
吴娇蓉, 王宇沁, 陈小鸿. 公共卫生事件持续期通勤合乘设计及组织效率影响分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020,33(11):20-29.
[12]
MOODY J, MIDDLETON S, ZHAO J H. Rider-to-rider discriminatory attitudes and ridesharing behavior[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology & Behaviour, 2019, 62: 258-273.
[13]
王雨. 乘客网约拼车服务使用意愿的形成机制研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2021.
[14]
DIAS F F, LAVIERI P S, GARIKAPATI V M, et al. A behavioral choice model of the use of car-sharing and ride-sourcing services[J]. Transportation, 2017, 44(6): 1307-1323.
[15]
SHAO Z, YIN H. Building customers′ trust in the ridesharing platform with institutional mechanisms: an empirical study in China[J]. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 2019, 29(5): 1040-1063.
[16]
SHAO Z, GUO Y, LI X T, et al. Sources of influences on customers' trust in ride-sharing: why use experience matters?[J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2020, 120(8): 1459-1482.
[17]
HOU T, CHENG X, CHENG X. The role of transaction cost and trust in e-loyalty: a mixed-methods study of ride-sharing[J]. Information Technology & People, 2020, 34(3): 1018-1038.
[18]
CHENG X, HOU T, MOU J. Investigating perceived risks and benefits of information privacy disclosure in IT-enabled ride-sharing[J]. Information & Management, 2021, 58(6): 103450.
[19]
LI W, PU Z, LI Y, et al. Characterization of ridesplitting based on observed data: a case study of Chengdu, China[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2019, 100: 330-353.
[20]
TU M, LI Y, LI W, et al. Improving ridesplitting services using optimization procedures on a shareability network: a case study of Chengdu[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 149: 119733.
[21]
马瑞民, 姚立飞. 基于双边理论的顺风车稳定匹配优化[J]. 公路交通科技, 2021,38(4):131-141.
[22]
周桂良. 车联网环境下私家车拼车优先导向的出行效能提升研究[D]. 镇江: 江苏大学, 2019.
[23]
WITELL L, LÖFGREN M, DAHLGAARD J J. Theory of attractive quality and the Kano methodology: the past, the present, and the future[J]. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2013, 24(11-12): 1241-1252.
[24]
YADAV H C, JAIN R, SHUKLA S, et al. Prioritization of aesthetic attributes of car profile[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2013, 43(4) : 296-303.
[25]
MA M Y, CHEN C W, CHANG Y M. Using Kano model to differentiate between future vehicle-driving services[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2019, 69: 142-152.
[26]
韦艳丽, 李安, 徐曦, 等. 基于Kano-QFD的云养宠APP可用性设计研究[J]. 包装工程, 2022,43(2):378-386.
[27]
韩旭, 李宇轩, 谭保华, 等. 基于模糊Kano模型与熵权TOPSIS的产品设计研究[J/OL]. 包装工程:1-13[2022-04-20]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/50.1094.TB.20211116.1635.010.html.
[28]
李树, 蒋鹏. 基于模糊KANO-SEM模型的用户需求识别方法研究[J]. 包装工程, 2022,43(4):156-162.
[29]
XU Q, JIAO R J, TANG X, et al. An analytical Kano model for customer need analysis[J]. Design Studies, 2009, 30(1): 87-110.
[30]
BERGER C, BLAUTH R, BERGER D, et al. Kano′s methods for understanding customer-defined quality[J]. Center for Quality Management Journal, 1993(4): 3-36.
[31]
易明, 宋进之, 李梓奇. 基于Kano模型的高校智慧图书馆功能需求研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020,64(14):45-53.
[32]
李松林. 基于Kano-QFD集成方法的高校物流服务设计要素研究[J]. 西部经济管理论坛, 2018,29(4):63-74.
[33]
邓杏仪, 刘林, 张瑞秋. 基于Kano-QFD的健身游戏系统优化设计[J]. 包装工程, 2021,42(14):148-154.
[34]
CHAUDHA A, JAIN R, SINGH A R, et al. Integration of Kano′s Model into Quality Function Deployment (QFD)[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2011, 53(58): 689-698.
[35]
屠星亚. 结合情境故事法、Kano模型和QFD法的文化景观旅游体验设计研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江工业大学, 2014.
[36]
薛景梅, 邢可欣. 基于Kano-QFD模型的校园快递服务质量提升研究[J]. 河北科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2019,19(2):31-38.
[37]
曾兰兰, 马勇. 共享经济背景下网约车用户粘性研究[J]. 企业经济, 2021,40(8):154-160.
[38]
朱乔. 基于结构方程模型的网约车乘客满意度研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2017.
[39]
李晋, 江勇东, 顾天奇, 等. 基于乘客视角的网约车服务质量评价[J]. 城市交通, 2021,19(2):103-111, 6.

基金

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2020JBWB001)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/