Classification Method of Operation Safety Accidents of Urban Rail Transit

  • 李松峰,冯旭杰,沙茜,刘书浩,胡雪霏
Expand
  • China Academy of Transportation Sciences, Beijing 100029, China

Online published: 2020-11-17

Abstract

In order to construct an accident classification theory that conforms to the characteristics and actual situation of urban rail transit operation in China, and to specify the detailed requirements for the classification of safety accidents in urban rail transit operation, by analyzing the current status of safety accident classification in relevant authorities and operating companies, some accident classification methods were summarized and proposed in two dimensions of hierarchical structure and classification standards, including single-level and double-level, as well as consequence, enumeration and combined accident classification methods. The advantages, disadvantages and applicability of different classification methods were compared and analyzed. At the same time, from the perspective of selection and evaluation of accident classification methods, an accident classification system that can be used to evaluate the integrity and effectiveness of the classification methods was proposed. The result shows that the single-level consequence-based classification method is more suitable for industry authorities, the multi-level enumerated and multi-level combined type are more suitable for operating companies; the accident classification system should include at least three levels of damage level, impact level and phenomenon level, and the corresponding severity of accident consequences is decreasing in turn.

Cite this article

李松峰,冯旭杰,沙茜,刘书浩,胡雪霏 . Classification Method of Operation Safety Accidents of Urban Rail Transit[J]. Transport Research, 2020 , 6(5) : 66 -74 . DOI: 10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2020.05.009

References

[1]中华人民共和国交通运输部. 中国城市客运发展报告(2019)[M]. 北京:人民交通出版社股份有限公司,2020.
[2]陈燕申,陈思凯. 英国城市轨道交通的安全统计和报告解析[J]. 城市轨道交通研究,2014,17(1):7-12.
[3]曾明荣,王兴. 中欧事故报告与调查处理比较研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(5):148-153.
[4]刘文煌. 东京城市轨道交通安防建设启示[J]. 铁道警察学院学报,2017,27(6):38-40.
[5]National Transportation Safety Board. Special Investigation Report: Organizational Factors in Metro-North Railroad Accidents[R]. Washington DC: National Transportation Safety Board, 2014.
[6]曹志超,李得伟. 新加坡地铁人性化设计与安全对我国地铁的启示[J]. 都市快轨交通,2013,26(2):138-142.
[7]谭钦文,段正肖,董勇,等. 一种系统化的生产安全事故分级新方法研究[J].工业安全与环保,2018,44(4):10-13,17.
[8]魏利军,吴宗之. 一种简单可行的危险化学品重大危险源分级方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2009,19(12):45-50.
[9]杨槐. 事故后果影响当量及其在事故分级中的应用[J]. 中小企业管理与科技,2008,22(10):56-57.
[10]崔文,罗云,曾珠,等. 机电类特种设备典型事故风险分级预警预控方法研究[J]. 工业安全与环保,2014,40(5):59-62.
[11]张朝晖. 基于事故发展过程的火灾隐患分级方法[J]. 消防科学与技术,2014,33(5):572-575.
[12]中华人民共和国原铁道部. 铁路交通事故调查处理规则[Z]. 北京:人民交通出版社股份有限公司,2007.
[13]国家技术监督局. 民用航空器飞行事故等级:GB 14648—1993[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,1993.
[14]中国民用航空局. 民用航空器事故征候:MH/T 2001—2007[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2007.
[15]段海洋,许得杰,曾俊伟,等. 城市轨道交通运营安全事故分析及评价[J]. 铁道运输与经济,2019,41(9):110-114.
[16]傅鹤林,黄震,王慧,等. 地铁安全事故分析及安全管理[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治,2019,1(2):59-66.
[17]罗云,江虹. 根据“海因里希法则”科学理解和有效落实“双重预防机制”[J]. 中国安全生产,2019,14(10):36-38.
[18]上海市交通运输和港口管理局,上海市安全生产监督管理局,上海市公安局.上海市轨道交通运营安全事故处置规定[Z].上海:上海市交通运输和港口管理局,2013.
Outlines

/