考虑铁路旅客偏好差异的离站方式选择行为分析

杨婷群, 陈坚

交通运输研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (3) : 1-9.

交通运输研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (3) : 1-9. DOI: 10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2024.03.001
理论与方法

考虑铁路旅客偏好差异的离站方式选择行为分析

作者信息 +

Departure Mode Choice Behavior Considering Differences in Railway Passenger Preferences

  • YANG Tingqun ,  
  • CHEN Jian
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为探究铁路旅客对离站方式的行程费用、在车时间、候车时间和车厢拥挤度等服务水平因素的偏好差异及其原因,运用混合Logit模型和潜在类别条件Logit模型从个体和群体层面展开分析。首先,基于铁路旅客出行特点和离站交通方式服务水平,以同行人数、行李负载、行程费用、在车时间、候车时间和车厢拥挤度作为情景变量,通过正交设计法生成意愿调查问卷;然后,在线上和线下开展调查;最后,采用极大似然估计标定模型参数。结果表明:行程费用、在车时间、候车时间和车厢拥挤度是影响离站方式选择的关键因素。混合Logit模型标定结果显示,旅客对行程费用和在车时间具有不同于样本均值的个体偏好差异。潜在类别条件Logit模型将旅客划分为3类:类别1的旅客对在车时间、候车时间和车厢拥挤度最为敏感,而类别3的旅客对这3项服务水平因素的敏感性最低。两模型从不同角度证实了旅客对离站交通方式服务水平的偏好差异及其对离站方式选择的影响,为铁路客运枢纽接驳交通方式配置和服务水平优化提供了参考。

Abstract

To explore the differences in passenger preferences and the cause of railway passengers′ preferences for the service level factors of departure mode, such as travel cost, in transit time, waiting time, and cabin congestion, a mixed Logit model and a latent class conditional Logit model were used to carry out the research at the individual and group levels. Firstly, based on the travel characteristics of railway passengers and the service level of departure modes, a willingness survey questionnaire was created using orthogonal design method with the number of passengers traveling, luggage load, travel cost, in transit time, waiting time, and cabin congestion as scenario variables. Then online and offline surveys were conducted. Finally, the model parameters were calibrated using maximum likelihood estimation. The results indicate that travel cost, in transit time, waiting time, and cabin congestion are key factors affecting the choice of departure mode. The calibration results of the mixed Logit model show that passengers have individual preference differences for travel costs and in transit time that are different from the sample mean. The latent class conditional Logit model divides passengers into three categories. Passengers of category 1 are most sensitive to in transit time, waiting time, and cabin congestion, while passengers of category 3 have the lowest sensitivity to these three service characteristics. The two models have confirmed from different perspectives the differences in passenger preferences for departure modes of transportation and the impact on departure mode selection, providing references for the configuration and service level optimization of connecting transportation modes in railway passenger hubs.

关键词

城市交通 / 离站方式选择 / 混合Logit模型 / 潜在类别Logit模型 / 偏好差异

Key words

urban transportation / departure travel mode choice / mixed Logit model / latent class conditional Logit model / preference differences

引用本文

导出引用
杨婷群, 陈坚. 考虑铁路旅客偏好差异的离站方式选择行为分析[J]. 交通运输研究. 2024, 10(3): 1-9 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2024.03.001
YANG Tingqun, CHEN Jian. Departure Mode Choice Behavior Considering Differences in Railway Passenger Preferences[J]. Transport Research. 2024, 10(3): 1-9 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2024.03.001
中图分类号: U491   

参考文献

[1]
叶玉玲, 陈俊晶, 刘小亚. 高铁站与市内交通换乘衔接选择研究[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2017, 20(11):45-49.
[2]
迟明, 霍娅敏, 刘广武, 等. 基于Logit模型的高速铁路旅客离站换乘选择分析[J]. 铁道运输与经济, 2021, 43(5):31-37.
[3]
GUTIÉRREZ A, MIRAVET D, SALADIÉ Ò, et al. Transport mode choice by tourists transferring from a peripheral high-speed rail station to their destinations: empirical evidence from Costa Daurada[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(11): 3200.
[4]
肖杰文. 基于计划行为理论的高铁枢纽旅客离站换乘方式选择行为研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2020.
[5]
张文会, 秦佳琪, 李洪涛, 等. 考虑拥挤度的常规公交与地铁出行方式选择模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(1):200-205.
[6]
骆晨, 李想, 钟林峰, 等. 基于家庭属性差异的大学生出行方式选择行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(3):227-232.
[7]
WANY Z, YANG Y, YAO E, et al. An analysis of commute mode choice behavior considering the impacts of built environment in Beijing[J]. Transportation Letters, 2022, 14(7): 733-739.
[8]
杨飞, 侯宗廷, 王亮, 等. 考虑个体异质性的汽车分时租赁选择行为[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2022, 57(4):745-752.
[9]
YAYLALI M, CELIK A K, DILEK O. Analyzing key socio-economic and socio-demographic drivers of domestic passengers′ airline choice behavior in Turkey using multinomial and mixed logit models[J]. Transportation Letters-The International Journal of Transportation Research, 2016, 8(3): 121-130.
[10]
SHIRAZI A K, ANDREASSON I, AFSHARA F, et al. Heterogeneity in the preferences of potential users of automated transit network (ATN)[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2023, 2023: 1-15.
[11]
ZHOU H, NORMAM R, XIA J, et al. Analysing travel mode and airline choice using latent class modelling: A case study in Western Australia[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2020, 137(C): 187-205.
[12]
任新惠, 潘娜. 基于潜在类别条件Logit模型的机舱座位选择行为[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(29):12772-12780.
[13]
杨亚璪, 唐浩冬, 彭勇. 考虑偏好差异的后疫情时代居民出行方式选择行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(3):15-24.
[14]
PEFTITSI S, JENELIUS E, CATS O. Modeling the effect of real-time crowding information (RTCI) on passenger distribution in trains[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2022, 166: 354-368.
[15]
潘义勇, 王心悦, 蒋冠宇, 等. 考虑出行者异质性的到达机场方式选择行为研究[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 37(5):150-158.
[16]
KRUEGER R, RASHIDI T H, ROSE J M. Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2016, 69: 343-355.
[17]
ZHOU W, LI X, SHI Z, et al. Impact of carpooling under mobile internet on travel mode choices and urban traffic volume: The case of China[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(8): 6595.
[18]
GREENE W H, HENSHER D A. A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2003, 37(8): 681-698.
[19]
郭源园, 吴磊, 曾鹏. “站-城”融合视角下的大城市中心城区高铁设站分析[J]. 南方经济, 2022(11):128-140.

基金

国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(22FJYB028)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/