基于模糊折中规划的运输通道节点布局评价方法——以波罗的海—亚得里亚海通道为例

刘畅, 孙立彬, 田春青, 宋佳芸

交通运输研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (4) : 83-90.

交通运输研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (4) : 83-90. DOI: 10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2022.04.007

基于模糊折中规划的运输通道节点布局评价方法——以波罗的海—亚得里亚海通道为例

作者信息 +

Evaluation Method for Node Layout of Transportation Corridors Based on Fuzzy Compromise Programming Method: A Case Study of Baltic-Adriatic Sea Corridor

  • LIU Chang 1 ,  
  • SUN Li-bin 2 ,  
  • TIAN Chun-qing 1 ,  
  • SONG Jia-yun 1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为合理选取运输通道上的节点城市,更科学地开展运输通道布局工作,参考波罗的海—亚得里亚海通道的节点城市选取原则,归纳出城市定位、人口和面积、产业分布、交通发展4个指标;从这4个层面查阅、分析该通道上21个节点城市的现状条件,并基于模糊折中规划方法量化布局指标;将指标进行归一化处理后,结合模糊偏好思想计算权重,得出波罗的海—亚得里亚海通道21个节点城市的综合得分并给出重要度区间。结果表明:华沙、维也纳、布拉迪斯拉发以0.97, 0.92, 0.81的高分位列前三,为一级重要节点;拉韦纳得分0.2,分数最低,为四级重要节点;其他17个城市分列二、三等级。分析得出:综合得分大于等于0.2是成为节点城市的必要条件,首都和省份的首府是运输通道节点的必然之选,交通枢纽和产业发展强劲的大城市也是通道覆盖的重要对象。

Abstract

In order to reasonably select the node cities on the transportation corridors and scientifically carry out transportation corridor layout, the node city selection principle of the Baltic-Adriatic Sea corridor was referred to, and the four indexes including city positioning, population and area, industrial distribution, and transportation development were summed up. The current conditions of 21 node cities were analyzed from the four levels, and the layout indexes were quantified based on the fuzzy compromise programming method. After the indexes were normalized, the weights were calculated in combination with the fuzzy preference thought. The comprehensive scores of the Baltic-Adriatic Sea corridor node cities were obtained and the importance interval was given. The results showed that Warsaw, Vienna, and Bratislava ranked the top three with high scores of 0.97, 0.92 and 0.81, which were the first-level important nodes. Ravenna had a score of 0.2 which ranked as the fourth-level important node with lowest score. The other 17 cities were ranked second and third. Through the analysis, it could be concluded that a comprehensive score of greater than or equal to 0.2 is a necessary condition for the selection of node cities, the national capital and provincial capital are the inevitable choices of transportation corridor nodes, and the transportation hubs and large cities with strong industrial development are also important targets for corridor coverage.

关键词

运输通道 / 节点城市 / 布局指标 / 模糊折中规划 / 波罗的海—亚得里亚海通道

Key words

transportation corridors / node city / layout indexes / fuzzy compromise programming / Baltic-Adriatic Sea corridor

引用本文

导出引用
刘畅, 孙立彬, 田春青, . 基于模糊折中规划的运输通道节点布局评价方法——以波罗的海—亚得里亚海通道为例[J]. 交通运输研究. 2022, 8(4): 83-90 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2022.04.007
LIU Chang, SUN Li-bin, TIAN Chun-qing, et al. Evaluation Method for Node Layout of Transportation Corridors Based on Fuzzy Compromise Programming Method: A Case Study of Baltic-Adriatic Sea Corridor[J]. Transport Research. 2022, 8(4): 83-90 https://doi.org/10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2022.04.007

参考文献

[1]
张琛. 欧盟交通运输行业引导政策的借鉴与启示[J]. 交通企业管理, 2015(6): 73-76.
[2]
Win.d. Wind金融终端CP/OL. (2021-2-31) [2021-2-30]. https://www.wind.com.cn/NewSite/wft.html.
[3]
国家统计局. 国家数据年度数据[EB/OL]. (2021-2-28) [2021-2-30]. https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01.
[4]
DUNMORE D, PRETI A, ROUTABOUL C. The "Belt and Road Initiative": impacts on TEN-T and on the European transport system[J]. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 2019, 4(10): 1-17.
[5]
GOLDMANN K, WESSEL J. TEN-T corridors-Stairway to heaven or highway to hell?[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2020(137): 240-258.
[6]
STEPHENSON P. Let's get physical: the European Commission and cultivated spillover in completing the single market's transport infrastucture[J]. Journal of European Public Policy, 2010, 17(7): 1029-1057.
[7]
SZIMBA E, IHRIG J, KRAFT M, et al. High-tool-a strategic assessment tool for evaluating EU transport policies[J]. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 2018, 3(11): 1-30.
[8]
周紫君. 欧盟未来道路运输政策解析及启示[J]. 交通运输研究, 2019, 5(4):140-146.
[9]
贾光智. 欧盟铁路改革的法律框架体系及发展启示[J]. 综合运输, 2014(3):65-71.
[10]
王潇怡. 新功能主义视角下的欧洲铁路一体化――兼及对区域铁路一体化的启示[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2016.
[11]
王贵平, 胡蓉. 欧盟铁路规划研究解读[J]. 青海交通科技, 2020, 32(2):1-6,16.
[12]
吴喜德, 纪龙. 欧盟内河水运发展趋势分析[J]. 生产力研究, 2012(10):157-159.
[13]
林坦. 欧美国家物流大通道的发展现状及推进措施[J]. 中国公路, 2017(6): 28-32.
[14]
张天悦, 林晓言. 交通在区域经济协同发展中的助推作用——以泛欧交通网为例[J]. 技术经济, 2011, 30(8): 69-73,105.
[15]
王济钧, 田芳, 刘玥彤. 美国、欧盟、日本和俄罗斯交通发展变迁规律研究[J]. 中国市场, 2019(13): 4-12,29.
[16]
李茜. 发达国家及地区交通运输长期发展战略分析[J]. 综合运输, 2016, 38(7): 86-90.
[17]
孟国连. 区域性运输通道布局规划的方法及应用研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2010.
[18]
刘强, 陆化普, 王庆云. 区域运输通道布局优化三层规划模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 50(6):815-819.
[19]
吴明, 王莹莹, 冯琪. 基于主成分分析的综合运输通道布局模型研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2011, 28(1):154-158.
[20]
张建旭, 李国文, 晏克非. 运输通道交通规划方案评价体系研究[J]. 公路交通科技(应用技术版), 2011, 7(10): 308-311.
[21]
赵光辉. “一带一路”背景下我国交通物流通道布局战略研究[J]. 当代经济管理, 2016, 38(8): 55-64.
[22]
王贵平, 徐桃让. 波罗的海-亚得里亚海通道规划分析[J]. 青海交通科技, 2019(6): 29-35.
[23]
GaWC. The world according to GaWC 2020[EB/OL]. (2020-2-21) [2021-2-30]. https://www.lboro.ac.uk/microsites/geography/gawc/world2020t.html.
[24]
Kearney. 2020年全球城市指数报告[EB/OL]. (2020-2-18) [2021-2-30]. https://www.kearney.cn/documents/1258856/63676687/%E7%A7%91%E5%B0%94%E5%B0%BC%E6%8A%A5%E5%91%8A_%E6%96%B0%E7%A7%A9%E5%BA%8F+%E6%96%B0%E6%9C%AA%E6%9D%A5_2020%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E5%9F%8E%E5%B8%82%E6%8C%87%E6%95%B0_VF.pdf/eb7e60fe-df75-7f93-3060-ac7f10ae81d0?t=1606749551000.
[25]
Google. Google Earth[CP/OL]. (2021-2-30) [2021-2-30]. https://www.google.cn/intl/zh-CN/earth.
[26]
刘畅, 魏丽英. 考虑人均延误和人均排放的信号配时优化模型[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2018, 50(9):83-88.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/