六轴铰接列车山区回头曲线道路安全可控车速阈值研究
Safe Controllable Speed Threshold of Six-Axis Articulated Train Driving at Switchback in Mountain Area
为减少铰接列车在回头曲线道路上的侧翻事故发生率,提高行车安全性,以国道G215部分路段为例,运用TruckSim软件建立该路段的三维数字模型和六轴铰接列车整车模型,分析了装载质量和质心高度两个因素对车辆在回头曲线道路行驶过程中的侧翻危险可控状态的影响,在侧翻阈值为0.8的条件下得出车辆的回头曲线道路安全可控车速阈值。结果表明:装载质量与回头曲线道路安全可控车速阈值呈指数为负的幂函数关系;质心高度在2.5~2.9m范围内时,安全可控车速阈值受质心高度影响较小,受载重影响大,需重点考虑装载质量来确定安全可控车速;装载质量为30~60t且质心高度为2.5~2.9m时,随着装载质量与质心高度的增加,回头曲线道路安全可控车速阈值减小速率变大,下降率可达46.7%,应综合考虑装载质量与质心高度来确定安全可控车速。
In order to reduce the rollover accident rate of articulated trains driving at switchbacks, and improve the driving safety of vehicles, the software TruckSim was used to establish a 3-D digital model of switchback and a vehicle model of six-axis articulated train, taking part of national highway G215 as an example. The effect of loading mass and centroid height on the rollover risk control state of six-axis articulated train driving at switchback was analyzed. Under the condition that the rollover threshold was 0.8, the vehicle's safe controllable speed threshold of switchback was obtained. The results showed that the loading mass and the safe controllable speed threshold of switchback had a relationship of exponentially negative power function. When the centroid height was within the range of 2.5~2.9m, the safe controllable speed threshold was less affected by the centroid height but more affected by the loading mass, so the loading mass should be considered to determine the safe controllable speed. When the loading mass was 30~60t and the centroid height was 2.5~2.9m, with the increasing of the loading mass and the centroid height, the decrease rate of the safe controllable speed threshold of switchback became bigger, which could reach 46.7%, therefore the loading mass and centroid height should be considered comprehensively to determine the safe controllable speed in this situation.
交通安全 / 回头曲线 / 安全可控车速阈值 / TruckSim仿真 / 六轴铰接列车
traffic safety / switchback / safe controllable speed threshold / TruckSim simulation / six-axis articulated train
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
长安大学运输科学研究院. 中国高速公路运输量统计调查分析报告[R]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2017.
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
王玉兰. 青海省长下坡路段交通安全分析与评价方法研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2007.
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
唐歌腾, 任春晓, 李臣. 基于Trucksim的不同弯道半径安全车速确定方法[J]. 公路交通科技, 2016, 33(6):134-139.
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
邵金菊, 张洪加, 谭德荣, 等. 基于Trucksim的弯道安全车速模型研究[J]. 广西大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 42(3): 961-969.
|
| [12] |
何江李, 龚波, 朱彤, 等. 基于道路几何参数的弯道临界安全车速模型[J]. 长沙理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 14(4): 75-82.
|
| [13] |
阎莹, 刘革, 田敏, 等. 基于Trucksim的弯坡组合路段临界车速确定方法[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 40(9):49-54.
|
| [14] |
陈冉, 辜志强, 范李, 等. 基于仿真的某型商用车弯道行驶安全速度模型研究[J]. 公路与汽运, 2016(1):6-10.
|
| [15] |
蒋佳辰, 李培庆, 吾泽胤, 等. 重型车辆变载工况下弯道路段安全车速仿真[J]. 科学技术创新, 2020(36):156-157.
|
| [16] |
王传连, 胡月琦, 李平. 基于TruckSim的装载工况影响下弯道安全车速阈值[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44(6):1337-1346.
|
| [17] |
丁剑涛, 裴王简. 山区公路弯坡组合路段铰接列车行车风险仿真分析[J]. 交通科技, 2021(1):89-93.
|
| [18] |
焦卓彬. 基于Trucksim的重型载货车辆弯坡组合路段安全性仿真研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2020.
|
| [19] |
金智林, 翁建生, 胡海岩. 汽车侧翻及稳定性分析[J]. 机械科学与技术, 2007(3):355-358.
|
| [20] |
夏光, 李嘉诚, 唐希雯, 等. 平衡重式叉车防侧翻模型预测控制研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2021, 32(8):987-996.
|
| [21] |
李海青, 赵又群, 林棻, 等. 汽车高速紧急避障路径跟踪与主动防侧翻控制[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2019, 51(7):135-143,153.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |