私人小客车合乘参与主体的法律关系与权责
Legal Relationship Between the Participants of Private Carpooling and Respective Rights and Responsibilities
与西方发达国家相比,当前我国私人小客车合乘在居民出行中的比例不高、发展不充分。除文化因素外,公众及各参与方对合乘权责的认识不清、法律风险较高也是制约这一出行方式发展的主要因素之一。为了促进和鼓励私人小客车合乘健康发展,进一步明确参与各方的权利和义务,从法律角度分析了私人小客车合乘参与主体的权责。首先,回顾了国内外合乘的历史沿革并分析其发展现状,找出存在的问题及成因。然后,对私人小客车合乘参与主体的关系进行梳理,建立了由司机、乘客、平台、保险公司和行业管理部门等多方构成的关系架构。在解析相关法理和法律法规条款的基础上,通过对比分析合乘与网约车的特征,进一步明确了合乘参与各方的定位和法律权责。最后,从健全管理体制机制、宣传引导和鼓励技术应用等三个方面提出建议,期望以此促进各方正确认识合乘行为中的法律风险和自身权益。
Compared with developed countries, at present, the proportion of private carpooling sharing in residents′ travel in China is not high and its development is not sufficient. In addition to cultural factors, the unclear understanding of the public and participants on the rights and responsibilities of carpooling and the high legal risk are also the main factors restricting the development of carpooling. In order to promote and encourage the healthy development of private carpooling and further clarify the rights and obligations of all participants involved, this paper analyzes the rights and responsibilities of participants from legal perspective. Firstly, it reviews the historical evolution of carpooling at home and abroad, analyzes its development status, and finds out the problems and causes. Then, it arranges the relationship between the participants of private carpooling, and establishes a multi-party relationship structure involving drivers, passengers, platforms, insurance companies and industry management departments. Based on the analysis of relevant legal principles, laws and regulations, through the comparison analysis of the characteristics of carpooling and online car-hailing, this paper further defines the positioning and legal rights and responsibilities of all parties involved in carpooling. Finally, it puts forward suggestions from three aspects: improving management system and mechanism, publicity and guidance, and encouraging technology application. It is expected to promote all parties to correctly understand the legal risks and their own rights and interests.
出行方式 / 私人小客车合乘 / 参与主体 / 法律关系 / 权责
trip mode / private carpooling / participants / legal relationship / rights and responsibilities
| [1] |
交通运输部, 工业和信息化部, 公安部, 等. 网络预约出租汽车经营服务管理暂行办法[Z]. 北京: 交通运输部, 2016.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
方捷. 顺风车问题法律探究[D]. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2008.
|
| [4] |
邹吟冰. 私人小客车付费合乘的民法研究--以APP平台约车为新视角[D]. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2018.
|
| [5] |
高晨, 刘丽, 后冉, 等. 网约车平台法律性质的定性研究[J]. 佳木斯职业学院学报, 2017(10):118-119.
|
| [6] |
胡冰昕. 我国顺风车服务中的侵权责任问题研究[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2019.
|
| [7] |
孙瑞瑞. 共享经济背景下网约顺风车的行政监管研究[J]. 南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 21(3):44-52.
|
| [8] |
张圣曼. 网约车平台监管制度完善研究--以顺风车治理为例[J]. 湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版), 2018, 15(12):84-87.
|
| [9] |
石慧. O2O顺风车的民事法律问题研究[D]. 北京: 中国政法大学, 2015.
|
| [10] |
刘大洪. 网约顺风车服务的经济法规制[J]. 法商研究, 2020, 37(1):14.
|
| [11] |
刘晓冰. 都市圈尺度下顺风车出行特征刻画与运营优化方法[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2021.
|
| [12] |
查云飞. 国家保护义务视角下的顺风车规制--以35份地方规范性文件为分析对象[J]. 苏州大学学报(法学版), 2019, 6(1):9-17.
|
| [13] |
白英欣. 网约车交通事故责任研究[D]. 石家庄: 河北经贸大学, 2018.
|
| [14] |
王力. 网约顺风车模式下交通侵权事故法律责任研究[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2019.
|
| [15] |
穆春香. 我国顺风车法律问题研究[D]. 上海: 上海大学, 2007.
|
| [16] |
国务院办公厅. 关于深化改革推进出租汽车行业健康发展的指导意见[EB/OL]. (2016-07-28)[2022-03-05]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-07/28/content_5095590.htm.
|
| [17] |
孙畅. 论顺风车平台的安全保障义务及其内容[EB/OL]. (2021-05-28)[2022-03-05]. https://www.rmfz.org.cn/contents/5/487893.html.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |